Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-18 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Hmmm, that's odd, because the patch Marcel sent me was later committed > to signal.h as rev 1.22 -- and it did indeed fix the Xfree86 3.3.5 > ``make install'' problem for me. H.. root@test-> ident /usr/include/sys/signal.h /usr/include/sys/signal.h: $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/signal.h,v 1.

Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-18 Thread Marc van Woerkom
> Hmmm, that's odd, because the patch Marcel sent me was later committed > to signal.h as rev 1.22 Thanks. I did falsely check the log for src/include/signal.h instead of the one in src/sys/sys > and it did indeed fix the Xfree86 3.3.5 ``make install'' problem for me. That's what I understoo

Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-18 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 18 Oct, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar >> and Sheldon Hearn. > > I did, but they don't fix the XFree86 3.3.5 build problem. I build 3.3.5 at Oct 16th (~8pm CET, cvsup & world ~3pm?), no 3rd-party patches applied. Bye, Alexande

Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-18 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 01:52:57 MST, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar > > and Sheldon Hearn. > > I did, but they don't fix the XFree86 3.3.5 build problem. Hmmm, that's odd, because the patch Marcel sent me was later committed to

Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-18 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar > and Sheldon Hearn. I did, but they don't fix the XFree86 3.3.5 build problem. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-18 Thread Marc van Woerkom
> I've got a box running yesterday's -current and it can't compile > or install things like XFree86 or ImageMagik due to syntax errors > in this file. See the mails from October 15th, esp. the ones from Marcel Moolenaar and Sheldon Hearn. It seems this patch has not been commited yet. Anyone go

Re: Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-18 Thread Martin Cracauer
In <19538.940215318@localhost>, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > I've got a box running yesterday's -current and it can't compile [...] >#if defined(_P1003_1B_VISIBLE) || defined(KERNEL) >.. >#endif I use the appended C file and compilation shell script to test include file cha

Is it just me or is sys/signal.h just completely screwed up now?

1999-10-17 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I've got a box running yesterday's -current and it can't compile or install things like XFree86 or ImageMagik due to syntax errors in this file. Investigating further, I find that the trouble begins around line 127, where we see: #if defined(_P1003_1B_VISIBLE) || defined(KERNEL) ..