* De: "Scott R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ]
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:30:44AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > * De: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-30 ]
> > [ Subjecte: Re: Is n
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:30:44AM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-30 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ]
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > > ref5% ne
* De: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-30 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ]
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > ref5% netstat -na -p tcp
> > ref5%
> >
> > dalek# netstat -an -p tcp
> > dalek#
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> ref5% netstat -na -p tcp
> ref5%
>
> dalek# netstat -an -p tcp
> dalek#
>
Both beast and ref5 are from Jan 4 and exhibit this problem;
builder, which is from Jan 28, doesn't.
Perhaps, someone updated the kernel and forgot to updat