Peter Wemm wrote:
This is based on ideas in the Jeff Mogul (DEC Western Research
Labs) paper from 1995:
These look like a subset of what Garrett was working on in 1996:
Guess Jeff Mogul beat him to it; I wish Garrett's code had been
committed, so I wouldn't have had to reinvent it myself.
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Clearly this would also be very applicable to non-Gigabit cards,
but the only one we use is the FXP, and the FXP driver is very
poorly structured for being able to do this type of thing (I
Oh, bah. The fxp clearly has the
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Clearly this would also be very applicable to non-Gigabit cards,
but the only one we use is the FXP, and the FXP driver is very
poorly structured for being able to do this type of thing (I
Oh, bah.
Here are patches to three of the Gigabit ethernet drivers to
implement soft interrupt coelescing. I have included patches
for the dc, ti, and vr drivers... the ti driver is by far the
cleanest.
I don't use Bill Paul's Tigon III driver, so I haven't
included patche for it (the patches should be
Terry Lambert wrote:
This is based on ideas in the Jeff Mogul (DEC Western Research
Labs) paper from 1995:
These look like a subset of what Garrett was working on in 1996:
(sys/i386/isa/if_ed.c)
revision 1.95.2.1
date: 1996/04/01 18:59:25; author: wollman; state: Exp; lines: +378 -22
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:40:57 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Here are patches to three of the Gigabit ethernet drivers to
implement soft interrupt coelescing. I have included patches
for the dc, ti, and vr drivers... the ti driver is by far the
cleanest.
I don't use Bill Paul's Tigon III
Peter Wemm wrote:
http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/techreports/abstracts/95.8.html
http://ftp.digital.com/%7emogul/usenix96.ps
Kris: Commit this... K PLZ THX.
Certainly not with this lousy patch with no context!
To be clear: I was complaining about the non-context diff, not
