Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Wojciech Puchar
improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an emu20k2, there will be RAM used from the motherboard. 1. I will need a real-time or a faster kernel- hence the high rate wanted- because the devices to be built will be used in an active environment: art, music, audio control. 2.

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 25 July 2013 02:51, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an emu20k2, there will be RAM used from the motherboard. 1. I will need a real-time or a faster kernel- hence the high rate wanted- because the devices to

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Super Bisquit
I haven't done much messing with scheduling. It is set at the default ULE for this machine. On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 25 July 2013 02:51, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Super Bisquit
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 25 July 2013 02:51, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an emu20k2, there will be RAM used from the motherboard. 1. I will need a

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-25 Thread Adrian Chadd
I mean, try -10 on it and report back. -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-24 Thread Super Bisquit
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-September/051789.html This is the thread that I was referring to earlier. Since the patch is for 2009, what are the chances it would work with 10.x or 9.x? On PowerPC machines with a low MHz rate- or any machine with a CPU rate of 800 MHz

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
Well, why is it reducing latency? That's the thing you should investigate. Is it because processes aren't getting enough time? or too much time? Or the audio device isn't getting enough time to run? etc. -adrian On 24 July 2013 15:35, Super Bisquit superbisq...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Kern.hz= +1 hertz at anything 2500 and above.

2013-07-24 Thread Super Bisquit
When I started with FreeBSD on a G3 BW, I noticed that the performance improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an emu20k2, there will be RAM used from the motherboard. 1. I will need a real-time or a faster kernel- hence the high rate wanted- because the devices to be built