On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmmm, I didn't notice that there is a BIOS which requires
memory area below 640K even when calling INT 15H/E820.
We cannot trust that today's BOISes have INT 12H, so it's
difficult to determine base
Thus spake Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps the problem with int 0x12 is the same as the one with int 0x15.
Old implementations of int 0x12 just read the word at 0x40:0x13 in
real or vm86 mode. This only requires physical page 0 to be mapped
readable to work in vm86 calls. New
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:05:32 -0800 (PST), Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Nate Try disabling acpi:
Nate echo hint.acpi.0.disable=1 /boot/device.hints
Nate My IBM laptop does not work with ACPI yet.
Hi,
I don't think acpi has got anything to do with his. I still had this
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:14:06 -0800, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Terry Or look in the -current archives; Mitsuru IWASAKI posted a patch
Terry yesterday at 11:29 PM.
Terry
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1206362+0+current/freebsd-current
Hi,
I have applied
Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hmmm, I didn't notice that there is a BIOS which requires
memory area below 640K even when calling INT 15H/E820.
We cannot trust that today's BOISes have INT 12H, so it's
difficult to determine base memory size w/o INT 15H/E820.
You keep saying
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:29:43 +0900 (JST), Mitsuru IWASAKI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mitsuru Thanks
Mitsuru Index: machdep.c
Mitsuru ===
Mitsuru RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c,v
Mitsuru
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, David Rhodu wrote:
Sidcarter wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past
few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes
immediately after loading the modules.
The error message is here
- Nate Lawson's Original Message -
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, David Rhodu wrote:
Sidcarter wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from
the past few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand,
since it crashes immediately after
Thus spake Sidcarter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in vm86 mode
fault virtual address = 0x9fdc8
^^^
That's a region of memory right before the 640K mark,
and your BIOS is trying to use it. This used to work,
but revision 1.544 of
David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake Sidcarter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in vm86 mode
fault virtual address = 0x9fdc8
^^^
That's a region of memory right before the 640K mark,
and your BIOS is trying to use it. This used to work,
but
Hi Folks,
I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past
few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes
immediately after loading the modules.
The error message is here
Booting
Sidcarter wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past
few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes
immediately after loading the modules.
The error message is here
On Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:29:29 -0500, David Rhodu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
processsor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, vm86, IOPL=0
current process = 0 ()
kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
Stopped at 0x145e: addb%al,0(%eax)
db t
FreeBSD calvin
Are the modules also new?
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Sidcarter wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past
few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes
immediately after loading the modules.
The error message is
I'm noticing the same behavior on a PPro system I have and am following
the thread SMP broken on PPro. It looks like the problem is not SMP
specific, but it does seem PPro centric.
Are the modules also new?
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Sidcarter wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just did a cvsup and
Try backing out 1.544 of src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c You'll need to do
it as a reversed patch or by hand, as there are some unrelated signal
handling things in 1.545 which you'll really need.
Drew
Michael G. Petry writes:
I'm noticing the same behavior on a PPro system I have and am
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Sidcarter wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past
few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes
immediately after loading the modules.
The same is there with 4.7-STABLE
The error
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:24:23 -0800 (PST), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Julian Are the modules also new?
Hi,
Yes, the modules are also new. But, I don't think it has anything to do
with the modules, cause even if I load the kernel after removing the
modules, I get the same crash.
Hi,
Try backing out 1.544 of src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c You'll need to do
it as a reversed patch or by hand, as there are some unrelated signal
handling things in 1.545 which you'll really need.
Hmmm, I didn't notice that there is a BIOS which requires
memory area below 640K even when
Thus spake Michael G. Petry [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm noticing the same behavior on a PPro system I have and am following
the thread SMP broken on PPro. It looks like the problem is not SMP
specific, but it does seem PPro centric.
I observed the problem on a PPro as well, but it is not specific
OK, some questions:
- What is the size of your base memory (reported by boot loader)?
- Does attached patches solve your problem?
- Is this problem specific to IBM Netvista?
Thanks
Index: locore.s
===
RCS file:
21 matches
Mail list logo
