On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> I'm now trying Terry's patch (just rebuilding a kernel).
>
> jroberson> You are using 100mb of KVA for malloc(9)? Are you certain
> jroberson> that you don't have a memory leak?
>
> Maybe there's a chance of a memory leakage by GLOBAL, but I don
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
> kernel panics periodically with following message:
>
> panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
>
> The number '4096' and '107651072' is always
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
> kernel panics periodically with following message:
>
> panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
>
> The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I
>
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
kernel panics periodically with following message:
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I
missing something?
-- -
Makoto `MAR'