Re: Kernel panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2002-10-15 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > I'm now trying Terry's patch (just rebuilding a kernel). > > jroberson> You are using 100mb of KVA for malloc(9)? Are you certain > jroberson> that you don't have a memory leak? > > Maybe there's a chance of a memory leakage by GLOBAL, but I don

Re: Kernel panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2002-10-14 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the > kernel panics periodically with following message: > > panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated > > The number '4096' and '107651072' is always

Re: Kernel panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2002-10-14 Thread Terry Lambert
Makoto Matsushita wrote: > After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the > kernel panics periodically with following message: > > panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated > > The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I >

Kernel panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2002-10-14 Thread Makoto Matsushita
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the kernel panics periodically with following message: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I missing something? -- - Makoto `MAR'