On Thursday 30 October 2003 10:30 am, othermark wrote:
> I'll me too this one..
>
> Another backtrace with a different call sequence (via ipv6), exact same LOR
>
> lock order reversal
> 1st 0xc2177c90 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:182
> 2nd 0xc206537c radix node head (radix node he
I'll me too this one..
Another backtrace with a different call sequence (via ipv6), exact same LOR
lock order reversal
1st 0xc2177c90 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:182
2nd 0xc206537c radix node head (radix node head) @ /usr/src/sys/net
route.c:544
Stack backtrace:
backtrace(c084
lock order reversal
1st 0xc220b690 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:182
2nd 0xc204807c radix node head (radix node head) @
/usr/src/sys/net/route.c:133
Stack backtrace:
backtrace(c087588d,c204807c,c087b88a,c087b88a,c087b8e0) at backtrace+0x17
witness_lock(c204807c,8,c087b8e0,85,c087b8e
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 03:21 am, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Already reported?
>
> lock order reversal
> 1st 0xc47b6490 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:182
> 2nd 0xc44be77c radix node head (radix node head) @
> /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:133
Yes, I'm aware of this on
Hello.
Already reported?
lock order reversal
1st 0xc47b6490 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:182
2nd 0xc44be77c radix node head (radix node head) @ /usr/src/sys/net/route.c:133
Stack backtrace:
backtrace(c05b43a7,c44be77c,c05b934c,c05b934c,c05b93a2) at backtrace+0x17
witness_lock(c