On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >I think he is right, because when upgrading host where was gcc3.2 to
> >current -CURRENT (with gcc3.3) 'make world' builds make(1) in first
> >place and it is builded by gcc3.2 with CPUTYPE=p4, so it will be broken.
> >
> >So gcc hav
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> On Montag, 18. August 2003 23:15 Uhr +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:00:54PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > +> > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before
> > posting. +> >
>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Removing CPUTYPE eventually gave me back working systems (I did restore
> 5.1-R bits prior to make world). Unfortunatly, I don't have the resources
> to investigate this further, but for the time being, I will not use CPUTYPE
> unt
On Montag, 18. August 2003 23:15 Uhr +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:00:54PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
+> > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before
posting. +> >
+> > At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It pr
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:00:54PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
+> > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting.
+> >
+> > At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken
+> > code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s.
+>
+> Andr
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:54:43PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting.
>
> At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken
> code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s.
Stefan,
This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting.
At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken
code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s.
You'll also want to make sure that your CFLAGS don't use optimization
higher than -O
I've got three machines having trouble doing a installworld, let alone a
buildworld.
One is a Dell Inspiron 8100 with a GeForce which used to run just fine on a
5.1-RC, which I updated yesterday.
Two are brand-new Shuttle SS51G with a SIS chipset and 2 GHz Celeron, which
I installed on Friday,