Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV)

2003-08-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > >I think he is right, because when upgrading host where was gcc3.2 to > >current -CURRENT (with gcc3.3) 'make world' builds make(1) in first > >place and it is builded by gcc3.2 with CPUTYPE=p4, so it will be broken. > > > >So gcc hav

Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV)

2003-08-19 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Stefan Bethke wrote: > On Montag, 18. August 2003 23:15 Uhr +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:00:54PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > +> > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before > > posting. +> > >

Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV)

2003-08-19 Thread leafy
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Removing CPUTYPE eventually gave me back working systems (I did restore > 5.1-R bits prior to make world). Unfortunatly, I don't have the resources > to investigate this further, but for the time being, I will not use CPUTYPE > unt

Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV)

2003-08-19 Thread Stefan Bethke
On Montag, 18. August 2003 23:15 Uhr +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:00:54PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: +> > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting. +> > +> > At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It pr

Re: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-18 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:00:54PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: +> > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting. +> > +> > At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken +> > code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s. +> +> Andr

Re: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:54:43PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > Stefan, > > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting. > > At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken > code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s.

Re: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-17 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
Stefan, This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting. At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s. You'll also want to make sure that your CFLAGS don't use optimization higher than -O

Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-17 Thread Stefan Bethke
I've got three machines having trouble doing a installworld, let alone a buildworld. One is a Dell Inspiron 8100 with a GeForce which used to run just fine on a 5.1-RC, which I updated yesterday. Two are brand-new Shuttle SS51G with a SIS chipset and 2 GHz Celeron, which I installed on Friday,