Re: MEXTFREE
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:54:16AM -0700, Chad David wrote: MEXTFREE results in a call to _mext_free() which is only defined within subr_mbuf.c, and is not static. Should the prototype be moved into sys/mbuf.h, or should MEXTFREE be moved into subr_mbuf.c, or is it ok like this? It should stay like this. The easy (macro) case deals with only the reference count issue. We only call the function if we really have to free the object (i.e. ref count is dropped to zero). Thanks. -- Chad David[EMAIL PROTECTED] ACNS Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada -- Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Re: MEXTFREE
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote: On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:54:16AM -0700, Chad David wrote: MEXTFREE results in a call to _mext_free() which is only defined within subr_mbuf.c, and is not static. Should the prototype be moved into sys/mbuf.h, or should MEXTFREE be moved into subr_mbuf.c, or is it ok like this? It should stay like this. The easy (macro) case deals with only the reference count issue. We only call the function if we really have to free the object (i.e. ref count is dropped to zero). But clients that use MEXTFREE (if any) see the function call, so they need a prototype in scope. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
MEXTFREE
MEXTFREE results in a call to _mext_free() which is only defined within subr_mbuf.c, and is not static. Should the prototype be moved into sys/mbuf.h, or should MEXTFREE be moved into subr_mbuf.c, or is it ok like this? Thanks. -- Chad David[EMAIL PROTECTED] ACNS Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
