Hi!
> > > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the
> > > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before
> > > you fixed puc0 to find them.
> >
> > The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not
> > seem to work (tested using kermit), either
> Hi!
>
> > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the
> > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before
> > you fixed puc0 to find them.
>
> The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not
> seem to work (tested using kermit), either 8-(
But
Hi!
> >> > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the
> >> > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before
> >> > you fixed puc0 to find them.
> >> The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not
> >> seem to work (tested using kermit), either
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 5:09 PM Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019, 4:41 PM Kurt Jaeger
>> Hi!
>>
>> > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the
>> > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before
>> > you fixed puc0 to find them.
>>
>> The problem is that
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019, 4:41 PM Kurt Jaeger Hi!
>
> > Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the
> > device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before
> > you fixed puc0 to find them.
>
> The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not
> seem to work
Hi!
> Well no longer needed as puc0 has found and allocated the
> device(s) which would of shown up had you done this before
> you fixed puc0 to find them.
The problem is that the found 4 uarts are not 8 uarts, and they do not
seem to work (tested using kermit), either 8-(
Any hints on how to
> Hi!
>
> > > It only detects four (or six?) serials...
> > Are perhaps 2 of them being consumed by sio?
>
> See my other post, the system found 13 uarts 8-}
>
> > > So I think I found a 'somehow' working setup and have to add stuff to
> > > sys/dev/puc/pucdata.c to match it. Thanks for the
Hi!
> > none1@pci0:7:4:0: class=0x070002 card=0x000814a1 chip=0x000814a1
> > rev=0xb0 hdr=0x00
> > vendor = 'Systembase Co Ltd'
> > class = simple comms
> > subclass = UART
> > bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1040, size 64, enabled
> > bar [14]
Hi!
> > > uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0
[...]
> > I compared it to a second, similar hardware and there I found the same
> > uart2,
> > even if no card was installed 8-(
> >
> > So it seems the card is not detected at all 8-(
>
> Need to find out why it is not
Hi!
> > It only detects four (or six?) serials...
> Are perhaps 2 of them being consumed by sio?
See my other post, the system found 13 uarts 8-}
> > So I think I found a 'somehow' working setup and have to add stuff to
> > sys/dev/puc/pucdata.c to match it. Thanks for the pointer!
>
> Ok,
> Hi!
>
> > uart is the new thing. sio info should be ignored.
> >
> > Chances are good that this device doesn't have the proper entries in the
> > puc driver. Do you have any pci devices that show up as unclaimed?
>
> In a different box, I got this:
>
> none1@pci0:7:4:0: class=0x070002
> Hi!
>
> > uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0
>
> Ah, that is a false lead.
>
> I compared it to a second, similar hardware and there I found the same uart2,
> even if no card was installed 8-(
>
> So it seems the card is not detected at all 8-(
Need to find out
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 2:52 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > > uart is the new thing. sio info should be ignored.
> > >
> > > Chances are good that this device doesn't have the proper entries in the
> > > puc driver. Do you have any pci devices that show up as unclaimed?
> >
> > In a
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 2:52 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > uart is the new thing. sio info should be ignored.
> >
> > Chances are good that this device doesn't have the proper entries in the
> > puc driver. Do you have any pci devices that show up as unclaimed?
>
> In a different box, I got
Hi!
> uart is the new thing. sio info should be ignored.
>
> Chances are good that this device doesn't have the proper entries in the
> puc driver. Do you have any pci devices that show up as unclaimed?
In a different box, I got this:
none1@pci0:7:4:0: class=0x070002 card=0x000814a1
Hi!
> uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0
Ah, that is a false lead.
I compared it to a second, similar hardware and there I found the same uart2,
even if no card was installed 8-(
So it seems the card is not detected at all 8-(
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171
Hi!
> > Trying to get a 8-port serial PCIe card into operation (Exsys EX-44388).
> > After reboot, dmesg shows:
> >
> > uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0
[...]
> uart is the new thing. sio info should be ignored.
>
> Chances are good that this device doesn't have the
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:53 PM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Trying to get a 8-port serial PCIe card into operation (Exsys EX-44388).
> After reboot, dmesg shows:
>
> uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0
>
> and /dev/ has cuau2* devices. It's unclear, which of the 8
Hi!
Trying to get a 8-port serial PCIe card into operation (Exsys EX-44388).
After reboot, dmesg shows:
uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3e8-0x3ef irq 10 on acpi0
and /dev/ has cuau2* devices. It's unclear, which of the 8 ports
is cuau2 (I'll test that later, I promise 8-), but where are the
19 matches
Mail list logo
