On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT :
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz
sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will fail to patch on the
latest -CURRENT but
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 23:28 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
I'm successfuly using the following on latest 9-CURRENT :
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfsv28-20110219-nopython.patch.xz
sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h will
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what
the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it
failed.
It looks like there are two patches to sysmacros.h - the first adds SIGNOF and
2011/2/25 Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:59:04AM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
Added ? The patch fails because the svn tag is not expanded, but what
the patch does is remove the file. You can do so after patching if it
failed.
It looks like there are two patches to
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 13:08 +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
Not the same sysmacros.h, the one patched is
sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/sys/sysmacros.h, the other one
you referenced (sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h) is
removed by the patch.
So it is - apologies for the
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 08:01, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
`-e' option in zdb(8) now
2011/2/23 Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 08:01, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
The new patchset is ready for testing:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
`-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default
$ zdb -ec blah
Configuration for
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:40AM +0200, Andrei Kolu wrote:
2010/12/14 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:54:36AM +0300, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий)
wrote:
I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far
it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
mentioning. Here are the steps I made:
1. Installed
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
`-e' option in zdb(8) now looks under /dev/dsk by default
$ zdb -ec blah
Configuration for import:
vdev_children: 1
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:29:14 +0300, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org
wrote:
2010/12/16 Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) ggg_m...@inbox.ru:
I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So
far
it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
I got more stacktraces in course of compilation of bash, see the updated
dmesg.
By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might
perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:54:36 +0300, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий)
On 17/12/2010 08:56, Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) wrote:
By the way, could someone suggest what types of stability tests I might
perform? I.e. examples of disk- and FS-intensive workloads.
Run blogbench and bonnie++ at the same time, possibly with tarring and
untarring /usr/ports.
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org:
Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before
v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot
support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can
import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15)
On 12/15/2010 23:19, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:00PM -0500, ben wilber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not
First of all, thank pjd@, mm@ and others who made zfs go ahead in
FreeBSD! You are absolutely monsters!
Now one question, what I do wrong, that I can't use /boot/zfsboot to
boot MBR+zfs-only FreeBSD?
More info. If I use /boot/zfsboot form recent STABLE (from snapshot CD
or built myself) to
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org:
Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before
v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot
support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can
import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15)
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org:
Please test, test, test. Chances are this is the last patchset before
v28 going to HEAD (finally). Especially test new changes, like boot
support and sendfile(2) support. Also be sure to verify if you can
import for existing ZFS pools (v13-v15)
I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far
it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
mentioning. Here are the steps I made:
1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal install CD)
2. Csup'ped sources to CURRENT (as of 14/12/2010) [note
2010/12/16 Rechistov Grigory (Речистов Григорий) ggg_m...@inbox.ru:
I started to check the new ZFS version inside a VirtualBox machine. So far
it works for me without crashes, but I got some observations worth
mentioning. Here are the steps I made:
1. Installed 8.1-RELEASE (from minimal
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org writes:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
# cd /usr/src
# fetch
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
$ zfs allow
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/zfs/pyzfs.py, line 35, in module
import zfs.util
File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/zfs/util.py, line 31, in
module
import solaris.misc
ImportError: No module named
11:44 AM
To: Olivier Smedts
Cc: freebsd...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Steven Hartland;
m...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
make installworld
That's what I wanted to do, and why I
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not
upgraded) pool from -CURRENT. Thanks!
Only strange thing is the rc script complains:
/etc/rc: DEBUG:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15:00PM -0500, ben wilber wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
Running fine for 24 hours now under load with a ~50 disk v15 (not
upgraded) pool from -CURRENT. Thanks!
Only
2010/12/13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
# cd /usr/src
# fetch
- Original Message -
From: Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org
I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with
an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the
patch (it applied cleanly). Did not modify kernel config (no
debugging) or make.conf.
2010/12/14 Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk:
- Original Message - From: Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org
I tried it on my 8-STABLE box (root zpool v15 on 2 mirrored vdevs with
an usb l2 cache). I checked-out CURRENT sources with svn, applied the
patch (it applied cleanly). Did
- Original Message -
From: Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org
make installworld
That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new
kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28
kernel ?
Not if you have just upgrade from 8-STABLE to Current.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
make installworld
That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new
kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28
kernel ?
Yes, it is suppose to work. Exactly to be able to follow
2010/12/14 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
make installworld
That's what I wanted to do, and why I rebooted single-user on the new
kernel. But isn't the v13-v15 userland supposed to work with the v28
kernel ?
Yes, it is
Thanks for the notice.
I have found the cause of this error (wrong constants), tested the code
in both directions again (v15-v28 and v28-v15) + fixed it in perforce.
Bugfix patch (apply after pjd's patch):
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/head-zfs_ioctl_compat.c.patch
Dňa
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
# cd /usr/src
# fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
#
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
# cd /usr/src
# fetch
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
You can also download the whole source tree already patched from here:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:00:31PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
What's the expected behaviour for the sendfile changes as
sendfile is one of the problems we have here with the
double memory allocation required for it under ZFS compared
to UFS. Does this patch address that?
No. The patch
37 matches
Mail list logo
