Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote: On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) I am working on an update to codelite to 3.5.5375. However, it contains a lot of Linux specific things that I'll need to track down before I can commit the update. In particular, clang/llvm support and the database designer components are causing me problems. Anyway, the updated version will hit the ports tree within several days. I have just updated codelite to 3.5.5375. This update includes optional support for MySQL and PostgreSQL in Database Explorer, and clang-based code completion. Enjoy, -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project g...@freebsd.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp pgpKFtQnYwQWF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 03/01/12 09:49, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote: On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) I am working on an update to codelite to 3.5.5375. However, it contains a lot of Linux specific things that I'll need to track down before I can commit the update. In particular, clang/llvm support and the database designer components are causing me problems. Anyway, the updated version will hit the ports tree within several days. I have just updated codelite to 3.5.5375. This update includes optional support for MySQL and PostgreSQL in Database Explorer, and clang-based code completion. Enjoy, Great! It works fine for me. Thanks a lot. Oliver signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
I think this is just right post to intrude :) I'm developing software, and making it in pretty good IDE - Intellij Idea. There's community and pro version. What good in this company - it gives access to Pro version for not-small open source projects. I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling request for open source license. IDE is very strong and smart, support java/c++/php and a lot of languages via plugins. Thanks. -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling request for open source license. Are you requesting someone to create FreeBSD port for this IDE or you meant something else? -- Eygene Ryabinkin,,,^..^,,, [ Life's unfair - but root password helps! | codelabs.ru ] [ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC 4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ] pgpuP6wNZwsie.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
2012/3/1 Eygene Ryabinkin r...@freebsd.org Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling request for open source license. Are you requesting someone to create FreeBSD port for this IDE or you meant something else? I'm sorry to be not clear in hasteness of day! I think port is not required, they have good enough run.sh which gracefully understand what is FreeBSD and could start IDE just fine. What I meant, was that FreeBSD as a project could benefit from applying for their OpenSource Licensing program, so any commiter/developer could try and probably work efficiently in this IDE. Because I'm not committer nor some kind of mentor of project, I can only point someone to there. If you go on their site (google intellij), part of IntelliJ IDEA Buy Upgrade Open Source Project License Apply Now, you could learn more on conditions for applying. So, to summarize this all again: If there are some commiter/responsible person who can apply - then FreeBSD devs could gain one more IDE to develop some parts of FreeBSD. -- Eygene Ryabinkin,,,^..^,,, [ Life's unfair - but root password helps! | codelabs.ru ] [ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC 4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ] -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote: On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) I am working on an update to codelite to 3.5.5375. However, it contains a lot of Linux specific things that I'll need to track down before I can commit the update. In particular, clang/llvm support and the database designer components are causing me problems. Anyway, the updated version will hit the ports tree within several days. -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project g...@freebsd.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp pgpLSlUTB7ea2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) Oliver signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Am 23.02.2012 12:22, schrieb O. Hartmann: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. Anjuta compiles fine for me on 9-STABLE with GCC, but I can reproduce the build failure with clang that you've filed there. The following lines were also posted as bug-followup: --- (Note I'm not a member of the gnome@ team.) While I can reproduce the build failure with clang (possibly related to the not portable warnings your're seeing), building anjuta with gcc works fine for me. Can you post the command lines and relevant configuration files (like make.conf) that you've used to attempt a build with GCC? Chances are you haven't thoroughly switched to GCC. For me, using portmaster's -m option wouldn't work. Note that you can pass V=1 as make argument to get the full compiler command lines, rather than the short CC CCLD lines, to see what's actually happening. --- Please check the lines above. The relevant lines from the PR seem to be: --- *** Warning: Linking the executable benchmark against the loadable module *** libanjuta-symbol-db.so is not portable! ./../.libs/libanjuta-symbol-db.so: undefined reference to `sdb_engine_get_statement_by_query_id' ./../.libs/libanjuta-symbol-db.so: undefined reference to `sdb_engine_get_tuple_id_by_unique_name' clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) gmake[6]: *** [benchmark] Error 1 --- Chances are that these are genuine bugs in the Anjuta build system. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Not all IDEs are so out of data. Netbeans is quite current (7.1). Eclipse is pretty close to the commonly available version as well. Have you tried building codelite from their sources? I may give it a try, just out of curiosity... From: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de To: Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ports FreeBSD freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Sent: Sun, February 26, 2012 4:48:36 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 23-02-2012 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote: Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Haven't used it myself, but maybe devel/geany ? http://www.geany.org/ -- Joel ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:22 AM, O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver You may check whether you can use the following : http://www.widestudio.org/ http://www.widestudio.org/EE/index.html http://www.widestudio.org/EE/install.html http://www.widestudio.org/EE/builder-doc/7-3.html Personally , I did not use it . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
I don't know how well it would suit your purpose, but you could always try emacs-ide (at http://gna.org/projects/emacs-ide/ ) -- Igor M. :-) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. I'm using kdevelop-kde4 and it's awesome. It's using CMake for project managing, so it perfectly supports changing compiler, linker and stuff and even cross-compilation. Also, it has kick-off autocompletion and some small but neat things like forward-declaring things or auto-#including missing headers. But from my point of view it's even heavier than Eclipse CDT due to kdelibs and other deps. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to configure for use with clang/llvm. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/23/12 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote: CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried You could try NetBeans, but its size is comparable to Eclipse. - -- Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9GQwQACgkQrb26LrIR2NknswCgx5t43H3L7Al+vfhwft4x9nZ+ 8YwAniyGl5I6MZ8nv7JlBoYovobyM4BH =UHFf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
I use both Netbeans (7.1 beta and 7.0.1) and Eclipse for Java development on FreeBSD 8.2. I haven't used either for doing development in other languages, but both work great for Java. I highly prefer Netbeans over Eclipse, but have to use Eclipse for some things. If you want to try Netbeans, I recommend using Open JDK 6. There is an issue with Netbeans and Open JDK 7 at the moment. I have an open bug report with Netbeans regarding this ( http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206882 ). In the bug report, I mention a work around to get Netbeans working with Open JDK 7... though I wouldn't necessarily recommend it. Dan. From: Martin Schütte li...@mschuette.name Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:45:42 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/23/12 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote: CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried You could try NetBeans, but its size is comparable to Eclipse. - -- Martin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9GQwQACgkQrb26LrIR2NknswCgx5t43H3L7Al+vfhwft4x9nZ+ 8YwAniyGl5I6MZ8nv7JlBoYovobyM4BH =UHFf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an editor with more general niftiness by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an IDE. Dan. From: Jan Mikkelsen j...@transactionware.com To: O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de Cc: Current FreeBSD freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Ok, but I think an IDE that can easily compile projects with clang is not a bad idea. On 02/23/12 15:38, Dan Daley wrote: The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an editor with more general niftiness by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an IDE. Dan. From: Jan Mikkelsenj...@transactionware.com To: O. Hartmannohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de Cc: Current FreeBSDfreebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
I don't disagree. I was disagreeing with the notion that Unix is an IDE. From: Quentin Schwerkolt develloper.u...@hotmail.fr To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 9:44:50 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Ok, but I think an IDE that can easily compile projects with clang is not a bad idea. On 02/23/12 15:38, Dan Daley wrote: The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an editor with more general niftiness by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an IDE. Dan. From: Jan Mikkelsenj...@transactionware.com To: O. Hartmannohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de Cc: Current FreeBSDfreebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated version in the ports suited our needs. Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, but it is marked broken on FreeBSD. Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE is needed. Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
