Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-11 Thread Matthew Ahrens
FYI, I missed that this fix has already gone into illumos:

commit 5253393b09789ec67bec153b866d7285a1cf1645
Author: Matthew Ahrens mahr...@delphix.com
Date:   Fri Aug 30 02:19:35 2013

4082 zfs receive gets EFBIG from dmu_tx_hold_free()
Reviewed by: Eric Schrock eric.schr...@delphix.com
Reviewed by: Christopher Siden christopher.si...@delphix.com
Reviewed by: George Wilson george.wil...@delphix.com
Approved by: Richard Lowe richl...@richlowe.net

--matt


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote:

 On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 09:32:26AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
  
   Indeed, probably a bad key combo in vi :).
  
   I'm reverting r253821 and r254753 (the second one was supposingly
 fixing
   the first one) and recompiling my kernel.
  
   I will let you know.
 
  So far so good, I've been able to synchronize my datasets beyond the
  point where it crashed last time.
 
  Matthew, do you have any idea of a fix I could try on top of FreeBSD's
  r253821 and r254753?

 There has been some debugging on the ZFS mailing-list and I have tested
 a working fix.

 See:

 http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182191/2013/09/sort/time_rev/page/1/entry/1:38/20130909182626:D79EC5B8-199E-11E3-8BF5-CB08091A731B/

 --
 Jeremie Le Hen

 Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
 They forgot to mention Morons.

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-10 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 09:32:26AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
  
  Indeed, probably a bad key combo in vi :).
  
  I'm reverting r253821 and r254753 (the second one was supposingly fixing
  the first one) and recompiling my kernel.
  
  I will let you know.
 
 So far so good, I've been able to synchronize my datasets beyond the
 point where it crashed last time.
 
 Matthew, do you have any idea of a fix I could try on top of FreeBSD's
 r253821 and r254753?

There has been some debugging on the ZFS mailing-list and I have tested
a working fix.

See:
http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182191/2013/09/sort/time_rev/page/1/entry/1:38/20130909182626:D79EC5B8-199E-11E3-8BF5-CB08091A731B/
 
-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-09 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 11:14:44PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:05:55PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
   On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I believe this was added by this change set:-
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821

Might want to try back out that change and see if everything
works after that?

Actually, I already rolled back my kernel to August 1st:

# svn info .
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/head/sys
Repository Root: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
Revision: 253847
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: ian
Last Changed Rev: 253847
Last Changed Date: 2013-07-31 21:14:00 +0200 (Wed, 31 Jul 2013)


And the problem seems to have gone away.  I could perform a full zfs
send/receive whereas it would trigger a panic 100% of the time with a
recent kernel.
   
   I still think r253821 is the cause the reason being is prior to r253996
   ASSERTS in ZFS where not actually active in HEAD.
   
   So if you could roll forward but then backout r253821 and confirm this
   is indeed the cause that would be a good starting point.
   
   If this is indeed the cause be worth engaging Matthew Ahrens cc'ed to
   find out the reasoning behind the new ASSERT why you may be hitting it?
   
   
  
  Errm, was there meant to be some content in your reply Jeremie, as it seems
  to be missing?
 
 Indeed, probably a bad key combo in vi :).
 
 I'm reverting r253821 and r254753 (the second one was supposingly fixing
 the first one) and recompiling my kernel.
 
 I will let you know.

So far so good, I've been able to synchronize my datasets beyond the
point where it crashed last time.

Matthew, do you have any idea of a fix I could try on top of FreeBSD's
r253821 and r254753?

-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:35:45PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have the following panic every time I do a zfs receive on a given
 dataset.
 
 For the background, I synchronize a zfs dataset every couple of minutes
 using zfs send/receive.
 
 I think I recently got a panic (I'm running mav@'s geom direct dispatch
 patch) which probably happen at a bad time and left the snapshot/data in
 an inconsistent state.  Now, whenever my cron job runs, it triggers the
 panic.
 
 The process that triggers the panic is:
 zfs receive -F data/jail/caravan
 
 Probably relevant, on boot, I have the following message:
 Solaris: WARNING: can't open objset for data/jail/caravan/%recv
 
 
 I have a core around if needed to debug.  I will not try to repair the
 snapshot/dataset during this weekend, to get a chance to test a patch.
 Afterward I will have to start this job again.
 
 
 panic: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0, file: 
 /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/dmu_tx.c,
  line: 638
 cpuid = 1
 KDB: stack backtrace:
 db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
 0xfe00e62401a0
 kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfe00e6240250
 vpanic() at vpanic+0x126/frame 0xfe00e6240290
 panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfe00e62402f0
 assfail() at assfail+0x22/frame 0xfe00e6240300
 dmu_tx_hold_free() at dmu_tx_hold_free+0x167/frame 0xfe00e62403e0
 dmu_free_long_range() at dmu_free_long_range+0x1f5/frame
 0xfe00e6240450
 dmu_free_long_object() at dmu_free_long_object+0x1f/frame
 0xfe00e6240480
 dmu_recv_stream() at dmu_recv_stream+0x86e/frame 0xfe00e62406b0
 zfs_ioc_recv() at zfs_ioc_recv+0x96c/frame 0xfe00e6240920
 zfsdev_ioctl() at zfsdev_ioctl+0x54a/frame 0xfe00e62409c0
 devfs_ioctl_f() at devfs_ioctl_f+0xf0/frame 0xfe00e6240a20
 kern_ioctl() at kern_ioctl+0x2ca/frame 0xfe00e6240a90
 sys_ioctl() at sys_ioctl+0x11f/frame 0xfe00e6240ae0
 amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x265/frame 0xfe00e6240bf0
 Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xfb/frame 0xfe00e6240bf0
 --- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_ioctl), rip = 0x8019ddf1a, rsp =
 0x7fff5c08, rbp = 0x7fff5c90 ---

I rolled back my kernel arbitrarily in the past (2013/08/01).  The panic
doesn't happen any more.

I will try to narrow this down by dichotomy but that will be more
efficient if someone has a rough idea wherefrom the problem appeared.

-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Steven Hartland

I believe this was added by this change set:-
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821

Might want to try back out that change and see if everything
works after that?

   Regards
   Steve
- Original Message - 
From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org

To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0



On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 02:35:45PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:

Hi,

I have the following panic every time I do a zfs receive on a given
dataset.

For the background, I synchronize a zfs dataset every couple of minutes
using zfs send/receive.

I think I recently got a panic (I'm running mav@'s geom direct dispatch
patch) which probably happen at a bad time and left the snapshot/data in
an inconsistent state.  Now, whenever my cron job runs, it triggers the
panic.

The process that triggers the panic is:
zfs receive -F data/jail/caravan

Probably relevant, on boot, I have the following message:
Solaris: WARNING: can't open objset for data/jail/caravan/%recv


I have a core around if needed to debug.  I will not try to repair the
snapshot/dataset during this weekend, to get a chance to test a patch.
Afterward I will have to start this job again.


panic: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0, file: 
/usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/dmu_tx.c, line: 638

cpuid = 1
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
0xfe00e62401a0
kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfe00e6240250
vpanic() at vpanic+0x126/frame 0xfe00e6240290
panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfe00e62402f0
assfail() at assfail+0x22/frame 0xfe00e6240300
dmu_tx_hold_free() at dmu_tx_hold_free+0x167/frame 0xfe00e62403e0
dmu_free_long_range() at dmu_free_long_range+0x1f5/frame
0xfe00e6240450
dmu_free_long_object() at dmu_free_long_object+0x1f/frame
0xfe00e6240480
dmu_recv_stream() at dmu_recv_stream+0x86e/frame 0xfe00e62406b0
zfs_ioc_recv() at zfs_ioc_recv+0x96c/frame 0xfe00e6240920
zfsdev_ioctl() at zfsdev_ioctl+0x54a/frame 0xfe00e62409c0
devfs_ioctl_f() at devfs_ioctl_f+0xf0/frame 0xfe00e6240a20
kern_ioctl() at kern_ioctl+0x2ca/frame 0xfe00e6240a90
sys_ioctl() at sys_ioctl+0x11f/frame 0xfe00e6240ae0
amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x265/frame 0xfe00e6240bf0
Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xfb/frame 0xfe00e6240bf0
--- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_ioctl), rip = 0x8019ddf1a, rsp =
0x7fff5c08, rbp = 0x7fff5c90 ---


I rolled back my kernel arbitrarily in the past (2013/08/01).  The panic
doesn't happen any more.

I will try to narrow this down by dichotomy but that will be more
efficient if someone has a rough idea wherefrom the problem appeared.

--
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org





This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 


In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please 
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk.

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
 I believe this was added by this change set:-
 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821
 
 Might want to try back out that change and see if everything
 works after that?

Actually, I already rolled back my kernel to August 1st:

# svn info .
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/head/sys
Repository Root: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
Revision: 253847
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: ian
Last Changed Rev: 253847
Last Changed Date: 2013-07-31 21:14:00 +0200 (Wed, 31 Jul 2013)


And the problem seems to have gone away.  I could perform a full zfs
send/receive whereas it would trigger a panic 100% of the time with a
recent kernel.

-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - 
From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org




On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:

I believe this was added by this change set:-
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821

Might want to try back out that change and see if everything
works after that?


Actually, I already rolled back my kernel to August 1st:

# svn info .
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/head/sys
Repository Root: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
Revision: 253847
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: ian
Last Changed Rev: 253847
Last Changed Date: 2013-07-31 21:14:00 +0200 (Wed, 31 Jul 2013)


And the problem seems to have gone away.  I could perform a full zfs
send/receive whereas it would trigger a panic 100% of the time with a
recent kernel.


I still think r253821 is the cause the reason being is prior to r253996
ASSERTS in ZFS where not actually active in HEAD.

So if you could roll forward but then backout r253821 and confirm this
is indeed the cause that would be a good starting point.

If this is indeed the cause be worth engaging Matthew Ahrens cc'ed to
find out the reasoning behind the new ASSERT why you may be hitting it?

   Regards
   Steve


This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 


In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please 
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk.

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
  On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
  I believe this was added by this change set:-
  http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821
  
  Might want to try back out that change and see if everything
  works after that?
  
  Actually, I already rolled back my kernel to August 1st:
  
  # svn info .
  Path: .
  Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
  URL: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/head/sys
  Repository Root: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
  Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
  Revision: 253847
  Node Kind: directory
  Schedule: normal
  Last Changed Author: ian
  Last Changed Rev: 253847
  Last Changed Date: 2013-07-31 21:14:00 +0200 (Wed, 31 Jul 2013)
  
  
  And the problem seems to have gone away.  I could perform a full zfs
  send/receive whereas it would trigger a panic 100% of the time with a
  recent kernel.
 
 I still think r253821 is the cause the reason being is prior to r253996
 ASSERTS in ZFS where not actually active in HEAD.
 
 So if you could roll forward but then backout r253821 and confirm this
 is indeed the cause that would be a good starting point.
 
 If this is indeed the cause be worth engaging Matthew Ahrens cc'ed to
 find out the reasoning behind the new ASSERT why you may be hitting it?
 

-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Steven Hartland


- Original Message - 
From: Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org




On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:

 On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
 I believe this was added by this change set:-
 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821
 
 Might want to try back out that change and see if everything

 works after that?
 
 Actually, I already rolled back my kernel to August 1st:
 
 # svn info .

 Path: .
 Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
 URL: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/head/sys
 Repository Root: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
 Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
 Revision: 253847
 Node Kind: directory
 Schedule: normal
 Last Changed Author: ian
 Last Changed Rev: 253847
 Last Changed Date: 2013-07-31 21:14:00 +0200 (Wed, 31 Jul 2013)
 
 
 And the problem seems to have gone away.  I could perform a full zfs

 send/receive whereas it would trigger a panic 100% of the time with a
 recent kernel.

I still think r253821 is the cause the reason being is prior to r253996
ASSERTS in ZFS where not actually active in HEAD.

So if you could roll forward but then backout r253821 and confirm this
is indeed the cause that would be a good starting point.

If this is indeed the cause be worth engaging Matthew Ahrens cc'ed to
find out the reasoning behind the new ASSERT why you may be hitting it?





Errm, was there meant to be some content in your reply Jeremie, as it seems
to be missing?

   Regards
   Steve


This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 


In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please 
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmas...@multiplay.co.uk.

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-08 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:05:55PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
  On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:02:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
   On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
   I believe this was added by this change set:-
   http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=253821
   
   Might want to try back out that change and see if everything
   works after that?
   
   Actually, I already rolled back my kernel to August 1st:
   
   # svn info .
   Path: .
   Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
   URL: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/head/sys
   Repository Root: http://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
   Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
   Revision: 253847
   Node Kind: directory
   Schedule: normal
   Last Changed Author: ian
   Last Changed Rev: 253847
   Last Changed Date: 2013-07-31 21:14:00 +0200 (Wed, 31 Jul 2013)
   
   
   And the problem seems to have gone away.  I could perform a full zfs
   send/receive whereas it would trigger a panic 100% of the time with a
   recent kernel.
  
  I still think r253821 is the cause the reason being is prior to r253996
  ASSERTS in ZFS where not actually active in HEAD.
  
  So if you could roll forward but then backout r253821 and confirm this
  is indeed the cause that would be a good starting point.
  
  If this is indeed the cause be worth engaging Matthew Ahrens cc'ed to
  find out the reasoning behind the new ASSERT why you may be hitting it?
  
  
 
 Errm, was there meant to be some content in your reply Jeremie, as it seems
 to be missing?

Indeed, probably a bad key combo in vi :).

I'm reverting r253821 and r254753 (the second one was supposingly fixing
the first one) and recompiling my kernel.

I will let you know.

-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Panic in ZFS: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0

2013-09-07 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi,

I have the following panic every time I do a zfs receive on a given
dataset.

For the background, I synchronize a zfs dataset every couple of minutes
using zfs send/receive.

I think I recently got a panic (I'm running mav@'s geom direct dispatch
patch) which probably happen at a bad time and left the snapshot/data in
an inconsistent state.  Now, whenever my cron job runs, it triggers the
panic.

The process that triggers the panic is:
zfs receive -F data/jail/caravan

Probably relevant, on boot, I have the following message:
Solaris: WARNING: can't open objset for data/jail/caravan/%recv


I have a core around if needed to debug.  I will not try to repair the
snapshot/dataset during this weekend, to get a chance to test a patch.
Afterward I will have to start this job again.


panic: solaris assert: dn-dn_datablkshift != 0, file: 
/usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/dmu_tx.c,
 line: 638
cpuid = 1
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame
0xfe00e62401a0
kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xfe00e6240250
vpanic() at vpanic+0x126/frame 0xfe00e6240290
panic() at panic+0x43/frame 0xfe00e62402f0
assfail() at assfail+0x22/frame 0xfe00e6240300
dmu_tx_hold_free() at dmu_tx_hold_free+0x167/frame 0xfe00e62403e0
dmu_free_long_range() at dmu_free_long_range+0x1f5/frame
0xfe00e6240450
dmu_free_long_object() at dmu_free_long_object+0x1f/frame
0xfe00e6240480
dmu_recv_stream() at dmu_recv_stream+0x86e/frame 0xfe00e62406b0
zfs_ioc_recv() at zfs_ioc_recv+0x96c/frame 0xfe00e6240920
zfsdev_ioctl() at zfsdev_ioctl+0x54a/frame 0xfe00e62409c0
devfs_ioctl_f() at devfs_ioctl_f+0xf0/frame 0xfe00e6240a20
kern_ioctl() at kern_ioctl+0x2ca/frame 0xfe00e6240a90
sys_ioctl() at sys_ioctl+0x11f/frame 0xfe00e6240ae0
amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x265/frame 0xfe00e6240bf0
Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xfb/frame 0xfe00e6240bf0
--- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_ioctl), rip = 0x8019ddf1a, rsp =
0x7fff5c08, rbp = 0x7fff5c90 ---



-- 
Jeremie Le Hen

Scientists say the world is made up of Protons, Neutrons and Electrons.
They forgot to mention Morons.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org