Kazutaka YOKOTA scribbled this message on Jul 24:
I am afraid this is not quite right.
Bruce, Doug and I are currently in discussion to fix this.
Hrm. Why does the AXP cons.c track udev_t while the x86 verson
doesn't? As best as I can tell, the AXP doesn't seem to need it any
more
Does this look right? Without this patch, my AXP was memory faulting
every time it booted, in the dev2udev routine.
Thanks
Index: alpha/alpha/cons.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/alpha/alpha/cons.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
Yes, looks right.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Gary Palmer" writes:
Does this look right? Without this patch, my AXP was memory faulting
every time it booted, in the dev2udev routine.
Thanks
Index: alpha/alpha/cons.c
===
RCS
