pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Jeremy Lea
Hi, On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test. I've not implemented the -d flag

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Mark Murray
OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test. I've not implemented the -d flag since it sort of became unneeded, and it's not really the way things are done in the rest of pkg_*. I've also not

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Jeremy Lea wrote: Hi, On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test. I've

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Jeremy Lea
Hi, On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: +++ version/perform.c 14 May 2002 12:41:41 - [...] + strlcpy(tmp, PORTS_DIR, PATH_MAX); + strlcat(tmp, /INDEX, PATH_MAX); I'd suggest snprintf(3) Yeah. Like I said, it needs a bit of polishing. I

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Jeremy Lea wrote: Hi, On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: +++ version/perform.c 14 May 2002 12:41:41 - [...] + strlcpy(tmp, PORTS_DIR, PATH_MAX); + strlcat(tmp, /INDEX, PATH_MAX); I'd suggest snprintf(3) Yeah. Like I said, it

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:50:39PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote: Hi, On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It needs some spit and polish,

Re: pkg_version in C [was: Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!]

2002-05-14 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Jeremy Lea wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: /usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more

Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!

2002-05-12 Thread Mark Murray
Hi, On Thu, 09 May 2002 20:33:22 +0100 Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: mark /usr/sbin/scriptdump This script is from KAME. It seems that NetBSD doesn't install it. Is someone actually using it? If okay, I'll change to don't install it. That sounds good to me! Go right ahead!

Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!

2002-05-10 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, On Thu, 09 May 2002 20:33:22 +0100 Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: mark /usr/sbin/scriptdump This script is from KAME. It seems that NetBSD doesn't install it. Is someone actually using it? If okay, I'll change to don't install it. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual

Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!

2002-05-09 Thread Mark Murray
Hi The response to the perl-script rewriting project has been very hearteningly _fantastic_! Here is the list as it stands. The gaps are fairly obvious (and probably mostly not critical in the short term): /usr/bin/afmtodit /usr/bin/catman John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re