Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
would you please have a look at the following sh fix? My brain is a
bit rusty and maybe I overlook a drawback.
When a child is receiving SIGSTOP, eval continues with the next
command. While that is correct for the interactive case (Control-Z
and you get
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Randell Jesup wrote:
Martin Cracauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
would you please have a look at the following sh fix? My brain is a
bit rusty and maybe I overlook a drawback.
When a child is receiving SIGSTOP, eval continues with the next
command. While that is
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin Cracauer wrote:
If you really want to background one process from /etc/rc, you would
still do that by writing a wrapped that catches SIGINT and send
^^^ ^
wrapper shellscript
Bruce (or other -currenter's)
would you please have a look at the following sh fix? My brain is a
bit rusty and maybe I overlook a drawback.
When a child is receiving SIGSTOP, eval continues with the next
command. While that is correct for the interactive case (Control-Z
and you get the prompt
