On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 03:06:25AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In addition to the dump problem I've reported, I'm also seeing issues
> > with df output. The following is obviously wrong:
> >
> > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity
Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In addition to the dump problem I've reported, I'm also seeing issues
> with df output. The following is obviously wrong:
>
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s2a254063 -246047 479785 -105%/
Does the atta
Brooks Davis wrote:
> In addition to the dump problem I've reported, I'm also seeing issues
> with df output. The following is obviously wrong:
>
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s2a254063 -246047 479785 -105%/
It's probably just really anxious
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:15:34PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Right you are sir, seems I had another patch which got mixed up there.
>
> I've updated the version of the patch on:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ufs2.patch
In addition to the dump problem I've reported, I'm also s
Right you are sir, seems I had another patch which got mixed up there.
I've updated the version of the patch on:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ufs2.patch
Poul-Henning
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Sharp writes:
>Hello,
>The kernel build with the patch applied fails with th
Hello,
The kernel build with the patch applied fails with this message:
make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_rule.c. Stop
It seems like this file was forgotten in the patch ...
- Christopher Sharp
--
Any time things appear to be going better, you have overlooked
som
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Kenneth Milton write
s:
>+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
>|
>| Yes, if you just drop it in, nothing should change much after all.
>|
>| You can then create ufs2 filesystems with "newfs -O 2" and start to
>| beat up the new code for good.
+---[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]--
|
| Yes, if you just drop it in, nothing should change much after all.
|
| You can then create ufs2 filesystems with "newfs -O 2" and start to
| beat up the new code for good.
Is it helpful to test this via md type mounts, or only on physical m
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
>
>
>On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 15:13:28 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> I have uploaded an updated version of the UFS2 patch:
>>
>> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ufs2.patch
>>
>> Please test this!
>
>Is this something we can drop in and exp
On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 15:13:28 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I have uploaded an updated version of the UFS2 patch:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ufs2.patch
>
> Please test this!
Is this something we can drop in and expect to work / panic / corrupt
our filesystems without any change
I have uploaded an updated version of the UFS2 patch:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ufs2.patch
Please test this!
Neither Kirk nor I have heard very much feedback, so absent any reports
of total disaster, it will be committed around 19th of june.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
11 matches
Mail list logo
