Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(1) Combine / and /usr into a single file system by default, and add
/usr/local/etc/rc.d to the search order, with appropriate hacks to
handle old-style scripts. The devil will be in the bikeshed, but the
implementation is easy, except for
Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
The reason I did this was to support services like mail and nss_ldap. I
really like to be
prefix safe, PR conf/56736 relates to this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/56736
I agree that there should be a better solution, and already asked Mike
Makonnen
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:45:40AM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote:
Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
The reason I did this was to support services like mail and nss_ldap. I
really like to be
prefix safe, PR conf/56736 relates to this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/56736
I agree
Andreas Klemm wrote:
I guess I don't see the problem. What is wrong with ports adding
startup scripts to /etc/rc.d? For certain ports, that is the only way
to get the startup dependencies right (like making sure openldap or
postgresql starts before your mail system). This will become more
Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But that kinda defeats the purpose of RCNG. One of the best features of
RCNG is that it makes it easier to add/delete applications from the
system. Not using it for this purpose reduces its utility.
Let's not let the typical BSD traditionalism get
Matthias Andree wrote:
Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But that kinda defeats the purpose of RCNG. One of the best features of
RCNG is that it makes it easier to add/delete applications from the
system. Not using it for this purpose reduces its utility.
Let's not let the typical BSD
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
Andreas Klemm wrote:
I guess I don't see the problem. What is wrong with ports adding
startup scripts to /etc/rc.d? For certain ports, that is the only way
to get the startup dependencies right (like making sure openldap or
postgresql starts before
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
snip
For 5.2-RELEASE, I think we should ignore the whole issue and let the
couple of ports that insert things in /etc/rc.d just do it. We're not
going to find any other solution in time to either close
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 11:47:24PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
..snip..
For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the
following conclusions winning out, and the rest being
David O'Brien wrote:
For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the
following conclusions winning out, and the rest being discarded as
flame-bait:
(1) Combine / and /usr into a single file system by default, and add
/usr/local/etc/rc.d to the search order, with
Robert Watson wrote:
For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the
following conclusions winning out, and the rest being discarded as
flame-bait:
(1) Combine / and /usr into a single file system by default, and add
/usr/local/etc/rc.d to the search order, with
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Richard Coleman wrote:
(2) Reevaluate the order at routine points in the boot where new scripts
might now be available (due to file system mounts or whatever).
Essentially insert the new cards into the deck, and shuffle. This
requires rethinking of our
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:25:08PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
All openldapXX-server ports do this for example
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db/pkg grep /etc/rc.d */+CONTEN*
[...]
openldap-server-2.1.23/+CONTENTS:@unexec /etc/rc.d/slapd stop 21 /dev/null || true
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:25:08PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
All openldapXX-server ports do this for example
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db/pkg grep /etc/rc.d */+CONTEN*
[...]
openldap-server-2.1.23/+CONTENTS:@unexec /etc/rc.d/slapd stop 21 /dev/null || true
14 matches
Mail list logo
