> At 2:57 PM -0500 2000/3/24, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> > At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >> This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
> >> just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a
> >> designation before 'early a
:This sort of concerns me, but if I remeber correctly, unmasking
:spl will cause a soft intr if there are pending interupts, the only
:problem is that completely software initiated interupts wouldn't
:get processed, or would they? Can you explain how they are being
:scheduled/run if you remove do
At 2:57 PM -0500 2000/3/24, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
>> just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a
>> designation before 'early alpha' this p
* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000324 10:23] wrote:
> A preliminary BGL patch is now on my site, relative to RELENG_4.
>
> http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
>
> It is the smp-patch-03.diff item at the end of the first section.
>
> My test box successfully built the wor
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
>just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a
>designation before 'early alpha' this patch would get it.
"Rough-draft proposal for early alpha versi
Umm... ok, some people seem to be enthusiastic but I really recommend
that ONLY experts mess around with this patch until they sign off on
its properness (or suggest fixes for improperness).
This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to
just work, but i
A preliminary BGL patch is now on my site, relative to RELENG_4.
http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
It is the smp-patch-03.diff item at the end of the first section.
My test box successfully built the world. I know I'm probably missing
something, but so far I can't tell
