On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:41:41 -0400
Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Err, not quite. Tried to build gnome2 lately? :)
>
> gnome2 depends on gnomemedia2.
> gnomemedia2 depends on gstreamer-plugins.
> gstreamer-plugins fails because ARTSD_FLAGS in several dozen Makefiles
> includes -
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 01:41:05AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >Why? The portmgr can tag the ports collection at any point in
> >time before or after the -pthread deprecation date.
>
> Steve, ports-freeze dates are set and published ahead of time just as dates
> fo
Daniel Eischen wrote:
I feel that a FreeBSD that manages to break so many existing configure-scripts
and build systems is degraded in usefulness.
Please, this is -current. If you want less pain then stick
with -stable and you won't be annoyed by the -pthread removal.
Perhaps I should make it clea
Steve Kargl wrote:
Why? The portmgr can tag the ports collection at any point in
time before or after the -pthread deprecation date.
Steve, ports-freeze dates are set and published ahead of time just as dates
for releases are. It's obviously not a good thing to have to try and be very
conservat
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> * David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030910 15:33]:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:41:41PM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> > > gnome2 depends on gnomemedia2.
> > > gnomemedia2 depends on gstreamer-plugins.
> > > gstreamer-plugins fails because ARTS
* David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030910 15:33]:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:41:41PM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> > gnome2 depends on gnomemedia2.
> > gnomemedia2 depends on gstreamer-plugins.
> > gstreamer-plugins fails because ARTSD_FLAGS in several dozen Makefiles
> > includes -pthread.
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Sorry if this sounds a bit flame-ish, but the way I see it we now have a
> system compiler in -CURRENT that doesn't even compile a hello world if
> -pedantic is specified and breaks with lots of existing software out there
> that tries to use a threa
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:56:45AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >4.9 and 5.0-R are independent branch. By your logic we should wait to
> > >4.10 or 4.11 or 4.12 or ... before any substantial change can be made
> > >to -CURRENT.
> >
> > The point is that is isn't wise to commit a change like the
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:41:41PM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> gnome2 depends on gnomemedia2.
> gnomemedia2 depends on gstreamer-plugins.
> gstreamer-plugins fails because ARTSD_FLAGS in several dozen Makefiles
> includes -pthread.
This is being worked on from the compiler stand point.
_
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:23:55PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >I have no problems in building the traditional C "hello world"
> >program with "cc -pedantic".
>
> You're right about that, you'll need a C++ hello world (, cout).
> This is in the archives anyway and (
* Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030910 10:53]:
> In 5-current we have 3 threads libraries and want to be able to install
> and use them in parallel. So there has to be a way to specify which one.
> This is why we need the ports collection to respect the PTHREAD*
> variables. A lot of po
Am Mi, 2003-09-10 um 15.30 schrieb Michael Nottebrock:
> Sorry if this sounds a bit flame-ish, but the way I see it we now have a
> system compiler in -CURRENT that doesn't even compile a hello world if
> -pedantic is specified and breaks with lots of existing software out there
Yes. I agree on th
Steve Kargl wrote:
I have no problems in building the traditional C "hello world"
program with "cc -pedantic".
You're right about that, you'll need a C++ hello world (, cout).
This is in the archives anyway and (should be) well known.
(why could
this change not have been made _after_ 4.9 is out
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:30:28 +0200
Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this sounds a bit flame-ish, but the way I see it we now have
> a system compiler in -CURRENT that doesn't even compile a hello world
> if-pedantic is specified and breaks with lots of existing software out
Sorry if this sounds a bit flame-ish, but the way I see it we now have a
system compiler in -CURRENT that doesn't even compile a hello world if
-pedantic is specified and breaks with lots of existing software out there
that tries to use a threads library because -pthread errors out (why could
this
15 matches
Mail list logo
