Hi,
thank you very much for your review and related fixes.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Li, Qing qing...@bluecoat.com wrote:
I have no problem with loopback routes when I work with not
point-to-point interfaces as I can NOT set same source address on
them. However, if the interface is
Hi,
I've started my work with not point-to-point interfaces and I've
found two problems. The first one -
snip
When I've done more investigation, it looks similar to
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=201543
So, I propose the following patch.
I agree with
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 16:57 +0200, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
Thanks for committing the fix.
I've continued with work on two NIC on same NET. Now, with
point-to-point interfaces too and I have more small fixes which I
submitted today:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159600
Hi,
I've continued with work on two NIC on same NET. Now, with
point-to-point interfaces too and I have more small fixes which I
submitted today:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159600
The fix is not entirely correct. The rtinitflags() could set RTF_HOST
flag when the
Hi,
I try to desribe the whole matter. In the simplest case, I have two
routers - each with two un-numbered interfaces connected in parallel.
Real data flow is managed in hardware. IP layer is used for managing
the hardwares, so I only need to be able to communicate with neighbour
thru one from
Hi,
after more testing of all matter related to two NIC on same net, I
just updated my submit
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159601
The patch I send here yesterday must be updated too. IFA_RTSELF flag
must be treat correctly on more places. The new patch is attached and
commented
Thanks for committing the fix.
I've continued with work on two NIC on same NET. Now, with
point-to-point interfaces too and I have more small fixes which I
submitted today:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159600
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159601
Hi Andrew,
I just committed Svatopluk's fix to HEAD, thanks!
Kevin
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 11:11 -0400, Andrew Boyer wrote:
We found and fixed a similar issue with an identical patch. It has been
working fine for us under stable/8.
Unfortunately I am weeks and weeks behind on
We found and fixed a similar issue with an identical patch. It has been
working fine for us under stable/8.
Unfortunately I am weeks and weeks behind on pushing fixes back to the tree, so
you had to duplicate the work. If it can be committed (and MFC'd to 8, please)
it would save others the
