Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11:
[..]
Thanks for your work on this, I'm very happy to have ZFS v28. I just
updated my -CURRENT system from a snapshot from about a month ago to
code from today. I have 3 pools and one of them is for ports tinderbox.
I only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11:
[..]
Thanks for your work on this, I'm very happy to have ZFS v28. I just
updated my -CURRENT system from a snapshot from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote:
On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote:
Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11:
[..]
Thanks for your work on this, I'm very happy to have ZFS v28. I just
updated
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:43:34AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote:
On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote:
Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11:
[..]
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an
md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning EOPNOTSUPP. You
should be able to reproduce the problem by doing a setfacl on
On 6 Mar 2011, at 16:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
2. Are you absolutely 100% sure the kernel you're using was built
with options UFS_ACL defined in it? Doing a strings -a
/boot/kernel/kernel | grep UFS_ACL should suffice.
Yep, it does:
% strings -a /boot/kernel/kernel | grep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/11 11:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:23:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more clear -- my investigation wasn't to
determine
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote:
On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an
md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning EOPNOTSUPP. You
should be able to reproduce the problem by doing a
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:23:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote:
On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an
md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning
Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 15:43:
On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote:
On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote:
Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11:
[..]
Thanks for your work on this, I'm very happy to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/11 12:49, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
The above looks like old-style, canonical six trivial ACL. Now,
cp(1) shouldn't even try to copy the ACL in this case, since there
is nothing to copy. So, for some reason, something failed
Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 19:27:
On 03/06/11 12:49, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
The above looks like old-style, canonical six trivial ACL. Now,
cp(1) shouldn't even try to copy the ACL in this case, since there
is nothing to copy. So, for some
28.02.2011 15:24, lhmwzy wrote:
Tks for PJD's work for zfs.
Would V28 is the last version of zfs because oracle don't open the zfs
code after V28?
1. Oracle opens the code, but only after some time. AFAIR they do open
the code after the major releases.
2. All head developers have quit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Pawel,
On 02/27/11 15:29, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
New major features:
- Data deduplication.
- Triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3).
- zfs diff.
- zpool split.
- Snapshot holds.
- zpool import -F.
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:21:29 +0100 Fabian Keil
freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
I updated the system without removing the tuning for ZFSv15
first,
Quoting Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de (from Thu, 3 Mar
2011 13:01:30 +0100):
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:21:29 +0100 Fabian Keil
freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
I just committed
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Fabian Keil wrote:
When you add the tuning back, does it take minutes again to boot? If
not, I assume it was cleaning up some leftovers the old version was not
able to cleanup.
I haven't tried that yet, but as I didn't upgrade the system's
storage pool I don't think ZFS is
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
Quoting Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de (from Thu, 3 Mar
2011 13:01:30 +0100):
Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:21:29 +0100 Fabian Keil
freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Pawel
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 08:34:08AM +0100, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
PS. If you like my work, you help me to promote yomoli.com:)
http://yomoli.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Yomolicom/178311095544155
I would like, but you should at least tell me what it is (what will be
Am Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:29:57 +0100
schrieb Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org:
Hi.
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
New major features:
- Data deduplication.
- Triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3).
- zfs diff.
- zpool split.
- Snapshot holds.
- zpool import -F. Allows to rewind corrupted
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 04:03:01PM -0700, Shawn Webb wrote:
I'm so excited for your work. Thanks so much for bringing zpool v28 to
FreeBSD. Will v28 come to 8-stable?
Yes, hopefully in 1-2 month(s).
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com
FreeBSD committer
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:37:25AM +, krad wrote:
On 28 February 2011 08:47, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 04:03:01PM -0700, Shawn Webb wrote:
I'm so excited for your work. Thanks so much for bringing zpool v28 to
FreeBSD. Will v28 come to 8-stable?
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 09:29:57PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
Thank you so much for this effort! I look forward to trying this once
it's MFC'd to RELENG_8 in the upcoming future.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com |
On 28 February 2011 08:47, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 04:03:01PM -0700, Shawn Webb wrote:
I'm so excited for your work. Thanks so much for bringing zpool v28 to
FreeBSD. Will v28 come to 8-stable?
Yes, hopefully in 1-2 month(s).
--
Pawel Jakub
Tks for PJD's work for zfs.
Would V28 is the last version of zfs because oracle don't open the zfs
code after V28?
2011/2/28 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org:
Hi.
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
New major features:
- Data deduplication.
- Triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3).
- zfs diff.
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
I updated the system without removing the tuning for ZFSv15
first, and somehow this completely messed up the performance.
Booting the system took more than ten minutes and even once
it was up it was next to
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:21:29 +0100 Fabian Keil
freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
I updated the system without removing the tuning for ZFSv15
first, and somehow this completely messed up the performance.
I'm so excited for your work. Thanks so much for bringing zpool v28 to
FreeBSD. Will v28 come to 8-stable?
Thanks,
Shawn
On Feb 27, 2011 1:56 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi.
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
New major features:
- Data deduplication.
- Triple parity
Yay! Thanks for all of your work on ZFS. I was just about to inquire about when
this was going to happen.
I've been having great success with v28 in the Dec 12 2010 version, other than
my minor complaints about imports and speed.
Concerning speed, I've been running further speed tests this
29 matches
Mail list logo
