Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:06:03 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Petr Holub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Matthew Dillon
:.. :>=20 :> I've discussed this issue with Poul-Henning Kamp. You need fsck :> from at least 4.7. :>=20 :... (Ruslan Ermilov writes): :Is this handled by fsck/setup.c,v 1.17.2.4 commit? Yes, I believe so. -Matt Matthew Dillon

Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:59:11PM +0100, Petr Holub wrote: > Hi, > > > While testing the 4.0 -> 5.0 upgrade path, I've created (under > > 5.0) a UFS1 partition and installed 4.0 onto it. After booting > > the 4.0 from it, kernel complained about ``numdirs is zero, try > > using an alternate supe

RE: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Petr Holub
Hi, > While testing the 4.0 -> 5.0 upgrade path, I've created (under > 5.0) a UFS1 partition and installed 4.0 onto it. After booting > the 4.0 from it, kernel complained about ``numdirs is zero, try > using an alternate superblock'' for / partition -- I've tried > what it suggests (by fsck -b 32