On Tue, 06 Feb 2001 16:34:39 +1100, "Chris Knight" wrote:
Since the new md was introduced, it is not possible to build a -current
snapshot on a -stable box. Are there any plans to MFC this soon?
Woah, what's the problem? This sounds like something that should be
fixed, not covered up with
Howdy,
-Original Message-
From: Sheldon Hearn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 February 2001 20:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: md, current and stable
On Tue, 06 Feb 2001 16:34:39 +1100, "Chris Knight" wrote
In message 004a01c09026$ec0261f0$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Chris Knight" writes:
Howdy,
-Original Message-
From: Sheldon Hearn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 February 2001 20:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: m
On 06-Feb-01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2001 16:34:39 +1100, "Chris Knight" wrote:
Since the new md was introduced, it is not possible to build a -current
snapshot on a -stable box. Are there any plans to MFC this soon?
Woah, what's the problem? This sounds like something
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Releases are bad enough as is w/o having to add in a multitude of
hacks so that one can roll a 5.0 release on a 2.2.x box, etc.
Sure, but allowing 4.x users to do a source upgrade to 5.0 makes the
upgrade path much more flexible. There's a big difference
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nat Lanza writes:
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Releases are bad enough as is w/o having to add in a multitude of
hacks so that one can roll a 5.0 release on a 2.2.x box, etc.
Sure, but allowing 4.x users to do a source upgrade to 5.0 makes the
upgrade
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You don't need "make release" to do a source upgrade from 4.x to 5.x...
You're right. Whoops.
I can still see it being useful in some cases, though, and as long as
the changes necessary to support it aren't too ugly it might be
worthwhile.
--nat
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nat Lanza writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You don't need "make release" to do a source upgrade from 4.x to 5.x...
You're right. Whoops.
I can still see it being useful in some cases, though, and as long as
the changes necessary to support it
