On 11/28/14, 2:37 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Nov 27, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
One o
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davi
On Nov 27, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get
I've recently created a port for linux-sublime and some of the packages users
might add to sublime require loading pty. I haven't read the full thread so I'm
not sure what would actually be removed but If there no reason for it I don't
see why waste the time on such a task.
is there for example
In message <20141127095229.go17...@kib.kiev.ua>, Konstantin Belousov writes:
>On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
>> >> One of my pe
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
> >> One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
> >> entirely, and pty(4) is one of
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
>> One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
>> entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
>> on such mechanism.
>> It's not
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
> One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
> entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
> on such mechanism.
> It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
Sam Fourman Jr.
On Aug 20, 2014 1:00 PM, "Davide Italiano" wrote:
>
> One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
> entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
> on such mechanism.
> It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:00:14AM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
> entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
> on such mechanism.
> It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) t
On 8/20/2014 1:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 8/20/14, 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
>> One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
>> entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
>> on such mechanism.
>> It's not possible, at least to my unde
> On Aug 20, 2014, at 11:05, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>> On 8/20/14 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
>> One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
>> entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
>> on such mechanism.
>> It's not possible, at lea
On 8/20/14, 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened w
On 08/20/14 20:00, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened with
On 8/20/14 11:00 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened w
One of my personal goals for 11 is to get rid of cloning mechanism
entirely, and pty(4) is one of the few in-kernel drivers still relying
on such mechanism.
It's not possible, at least to my understanding, converting pty(4) to
cdevpriv(9) as happened with other drivers. This is mainly because we
al
16 matches
Mail list logo