Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-28 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:24:16 pm Rick Macklem wrote: Kostik wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Kostik wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one?

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.) 2

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-24 Thread Ed Maste
On 24 October 2014 12:17, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: I remember the main reason for keeping oldnfs, both server and client, around in HEAD was to facilitate MFC of fixes to the branches which still use oldnfs, i.e. stable/8. If this reason is still valid, oldnfs have to

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-24 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:42:20PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: On 24 October 2014 12:17, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: I remember the main reason for keeping oldnfs, both server and client, around in HEAD was to facilitate MFC of fixes to the branches which still use oldnfs,

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-24 Thread Peter Wemm
On Friday, October 24, 2014 04:43:28 PM Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-24 Thread Rick Macklem
Peter Wemm wrote: On Friday, October 24, 2014 04:43:28 PM Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-24 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/25/14, 5:49 AM, Peter Wemm wrote: On Friday, October 24, 2014 04:43:28 PM Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the

RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-23 Thread Rick Macklem
Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.) 2 - Does anyone see a problem with getting

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-23 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:57:26 pm Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding issues in the new nfs that don't

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-23 Thread Rick Macklem
John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:57:26 pm Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding