-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:57:27 -0600
Subject: Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4)
> In the last episode (Mar 15), David O'Brien said:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:51:55AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > I get it with -O2 (-Os implies -O2, so it's probably the same
> > > problem).
> >
> > Not quite. -0s ==> all the -O2 optimizations that do not increase
> > code size. -Os can also perform other optimizations not part of -O2
> > that decrease code size. The -Os ==> -O2 only tells you how "risky"
> > in optimizing -Os is willing to be.
>
> Too risky, apparently :)
>
> Maxim: It looks like you've done quite a big of debugging already; can
> you get this bug to appear in a small piece of code? I'm sure the gcc
> developers would be able to fix the problem pretty quickly if it's
> easily reproducable.
I'll try to.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
