As I recall, Joe Greco wrote:
Hell, I've been seeing this for well over a year. The last time I mentioned
it, everybody seemed to think I was nuts. :-)
FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999
routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
At 12:17 AM +0100 1999/12/10, Brad Knowles wrote:
In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
Well, things continue to look good:
Fri
The patch previously mentioned has completely fixed my problem, as far as I
can tell.
routetbl 13117K 25K 40960K936240 0 16,32,64,128,256
after a day of uptime.
here's mine..
this is from a single homed machine, with a default route. it's also a IRC
server
so can it be committed?
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Joe Greco wrote:
The patch previously mentioned has completely fixed my problem, as far as I
can tell.
routetbl 13117K 25K 40960K936240 0 16,32,64,128,256
after a day of uptime.
here's mine..
this is from a
At 3:00 PM -0800 1999/12/9, Julian Elischer wrote:
so can it be committed?
In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
--
These are my
Brad Knowles wrote:
In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
Just to clarify, I committed it to -current already this morning.
John
To
Have any of you been seeing route table leaks in -current? I noticed
this week that cvsup-master.freebsd.org is suffering from them. I
actually had to reboot it because it couldn't allocate any more. From
the "vmstat -m" output:
Memory statistics by type
Hell, I've been seeing this for well over a year. The last time I mentioned
it, everybody seemed to think I was nuts. :-)
FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999
routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
16,32,64,128,256
Well, I havent seen problems of
Hell, I've been seeing this for well over a year. The last time I mentioned
it, everybody seemed to think I was nuts. :-)
FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999
routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
16,32,64,128,256
Well, I havent seen
At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
machine.
The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90 days, you would
think the problem
Hell, I've been seeing this for well over a year. The last time I mentioned
it, everybody seemed to think I was nuts. :-)
FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999
routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
16,32,64,128,256
Well, I havent seen
At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
machine.
The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90 days, you would
think the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hell, I've been seeing this for well over a year. The last time I mentioned
it, everybody seemed to think I was nuts. :-)
FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999
routetbl289178 40961K 40961K
Have any of you been seeing route table leaks in -current? I noticed
this week that cvsup-master.freebsd.org is suffering from them. I
actually had to reboot it because it couldn't allocate any more. From
the "vmstat -m" output:
Memory statisti
At 1:26 PM -0600 1999/12/8, Joe Greco wrote:
vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
16,32,64,128,256
netstat -rn | wc -l
16
I had never looked at this on my machines (main news peering
server in the Top 100, one
:
:At 1:26 PM -0600 1999/12/8, Joe Greco wrote:
:
: vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
: routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
:16,32,64,128,256
: netstat -rn | wc -l
:16
Please use 'netstat -rna' to get a listing of *all* the routes, including
the
:
:At 1:26 PM -0600 1999/12/8, Joe Greco wrote:
:
: vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
: routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
:16,32,64,128,256
: netstat -rn | wc -l
:16
Please use 'netstat -rna' to get a listing of *all* the routes, including
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Joe Greco wrote:
:
:At 1:26 PM -0600 1999/12/8, Joe Greco wrote:
:
: vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
: routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
:16,32,64,128,256
: netstat -rn | wc -l
:16
Please use 'netstat -rna'
Please use 'netstat -rna' to get a listing of *all* the routes, including
the temporary ones, not just the non-temporary routes.
FWIW, another datapoint:
set$ netstat -ran | wc -l
15
set$ vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
routetbl35 5K 18K
Please use 'netstat -rna' to get a listing of *all* the routes, including
the temporary ones, not just the non-temporary routes.
FWIW, another datapoint:
set$ netstat -ran | wc -l
15
set$ vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
Type InUse MemUse
here's mine..
this is from a single homed machine, with a default route. it's also a IRC
server (irc.stanford.edu), with a LOT of filtering of inbound traffic.
FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE #8: Sat Nov 27 17:15:49 PST 1999
11:33PM up 2 days, 20:41, 1 user, load averages: 0.03, 0.03, 0.00
routetbl
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999 17:41:49 -0800 (PST), John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The route disappears from the routing table, but it is
not freed. (The Leak.)
Actually, no.
Now cause some packets to travel on the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:1. Do I really need the splnet calls around RTFREE?
Yes. Because the route table may be flushed from an interrupt in
a low memory situation.
I guess I didn't state the question very well. I realize that
:+ s = splnet();
:+ RTFREE(rt);
:+ splx(s);
:...
:+ s = splnet();
:+ RTFREE(rt);
:+ splx(s);
:+ }
: ro-ro_rt = rtalloc1(ro-ro_dst, 1, ignore);
: }
:
:
:Now for my questions:
:
:1. Do I really need the
I think I've finally found the route table leak. At least I found _a_
leak, and I think it's the one that's been plaguing cvsup-master. I
have a question or two (see below) before I commit the fix.
Here's how to leak a route table entry. Establish a TCP connection
with another machine so that
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:58:40 -0800 (PST), John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[quoting me:]
What does `netstat -ran' say? You're not seeing all the routes
without the `-a' flag.
It lists some additional routes with -a, but not many. Here's the
latest output (still growing, as you can
Garrett Wollman wrote:
Now things start to make sense:
root@xyz(55)$ netstat -f inet -n | fgrep CLOSING | wc -l
1287
(this machine still has the bug that Jonathan Lemon fixed). Now it's
clear what's going on. The ``missing'' routes have been deleted from
the routing table, but
Have any of you been seeing route table leaks in -current? I noticed
this week that cvsup-master.freebsd.org is suffering from them. I
actually had to reboot it because it couldn't allocate any more. From
the "vmstat -m" output:
Memory statistics by type
28 matches
Mail list logo
