On Thursday 29 April 2010 02:40:24 Dima Panov wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Dima Panov:
while building lang/ruby18:
Which options to you use?
_OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1
WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true
WITH_RDOC=true
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:05:25 +0300, Dima Panov flu...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ruby is bad?
More like clang is bad, it's a known issue.
clangbsd errors in my blog:
http://dimapanov.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/clangbsd/
at this moment unbuildable some critical ports:
devel/binutils
devel/icu[4]
According to Dima Panov:
while building lang/ruby18:
Which options to you use?
_OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1
WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true
WITH_RDOC=true
WITHOUT_DEBUG=true
I notice your ruby is compiling w/o any -On, try with -O at least?
clang -I/usr/include -pipe -g -g -std=gnu89
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Dima Panov:
while building lang/ruby18:
Which options to you use?
_OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1
WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true
WITH_RDOC=true
WITHOUT_DEBUG=true
I notice your ruby is compiling w/o any -On,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:40:24AM +1100, Dima Panov wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Dima Panov:
while building lang/ruby18:
Which options to you use?
_OPTIONS_READ=ruby+oniguruma-1.8.7.248_1,1
WITHOUT_ONIGURUMA=true
WITH_RDOC=true
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:40:24AM +1100, Dima Panov wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Dima Panov:
while building lang/ruby18:
Which options to you use?
