SMPng manager's responsibilities (was: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem)

2002-03-07 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 7 March 2002 at 13:19:05 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, David Greenman wrote: No, Core has just said that he doesn't because he can over-rule any change in the kernel. And there is no requirement for him to justify it. That is definately *NOT* what core

Re: SMPng manager's responsibilities (was: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem)

2002-03-07 Thread David Greenman
On Thursday, 7 March 2002 at 13:19:05 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, David Greenman wrote: No, Core has just said that he doesn't because he can over-rule any change in the kernel. And there is no requirement for him to justify it. That is definately *NOT* what core

Re: SMPng manager's responsibilities (was: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() interrupt assem)

2002-03-07 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 7 March 2002 at 16:43:40 -0800, David Greenman wrote: On Thursday, 7 March 2002 at 13:19:05 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, David Greenman wrote: No, Core has just said that he doesn't because he can over-rule any change in the kernel. And there is no