I was testing with this again recently and it seems the big difference is
local_unbound!
BtW Barry thanks for the suggestion but I (and I think others) mentioned in
the thread that adding ldconfig REQUIRE in dnscrypt made no difference.
A box with dnscrypt+unbound doesn't have the issue,so I comp
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Miguel Clara
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Kevin Oberman
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Miguel Clara
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Garrett Cooper
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Feb 25, 2015, at 18:08, Kevin Obe
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Miguel Clara
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Garrett Cooper
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 18:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Garrett Cooper
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Miguel Clara
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Garrett Cooper
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 18:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Garrett Cooper
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 14:19, Miguel Clara wrote:
>>>
>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Garrett Cooper
wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 18:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Garrett Cooper
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 14:19, Miguel Clara wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > I noticed this too, but in that case why doesn't it affe
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:52:35 -0800, Garrett Cooper
wrote:
>
> > On Feb 25, 2015, at 18:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Garrett Cooper
> >> wrote:
> >> On Feb 25, 2015, at 14:19, Miguel Clara wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> > I noticed this too, but in
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 18:08, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Garrett Cooper
>> wrote:
>> On Feb 25, 2015, at 14:19, Miguel Clara wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > I noticed this too, but in that case why doesn't it affect all users? (or
>> > all the ones using dnscrypt+lo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Garrett Cooper
wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 14:19, Miguel Clara wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I noticed this too, but in that case why doesn't it affect all users?
> (or all the ones using dnscrypt+local_unbound) maybe something changed in
> "NETWORKING" recently?
> >
> >
On Feb 25, 2015, at 14:19, Miguel Clara wrote:
...
> I noticed this too, but in that case why doesn't it affect all users? (or all
> the ones using dnscrypt+local_unbound) maybe something changed in
> "NETWORKING" recently?
>
> Hum:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/etc/rc.d/NETWORKING?r
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Miguel Clara
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Miguel Clara
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Miguel Clara
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:11 PM,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Miguel Clara
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Miguel Clara
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Miguel Clara
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Oberman
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Mi
Although I'm not on CURRENT, I can reproduce this problem on my PC's
running 10.1-RELEASE. It started on 31st January on only 1 PC and then
appeared on others after a few days. I update ports on a daily basis, so
that may be a hint. Strangely, only 3 of 5 of my computers are affected.
Once it appea
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Miguel Clara
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Miguel Clara
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Oberman
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Miguel Clara
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Garrett
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Miguel Clara
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Oberman
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Miguel Clara
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Cooper
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:35, Miguel Clara w
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Miguel Clara
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Cooper
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:35, Miguel Clara wrote:
>> >
>> > > ]# rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* >/dev/n
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Miguel Clara
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Cooper
> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:35, Miguel Clara wrote:
> >
> > > ]# rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* >/dev/null
> > > rcorder: file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/tcsd' is before unknown
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Garrett Cooper
wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 10:53, Miguel Clara wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Cooper
> wrote:
> > On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:35, Miguel Clara wrote:
> >
> > > ]# rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* >/dev/null
> > > r
On Feb 24, 2015, at 10:53, Miguel Clara wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:35, Miguel Clara wrote:
>
> > ]# rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* >/dev/null
> > rcorder: file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/tcsd' is before unknown provision
> >
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Cooper
wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:35, Miguel Clara wrote:
>
> > ]# rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* >/dev/null
> > rcorder: file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/tcsd' is before unknown provision
> `kerberos'
> > rcorder: file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/tcsd'
On Feb 24, 2015, at 6:35, Miguel Clara wrote:
> ]# rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* >/dev/null
> rcorder: file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/tcsd' is before unknown provision
> `kerberos'
> rcorder: file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/tcsd' is before unknown provision `named'
> rcorder: file `/usr/local/e
com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 23, 2015, at 20:07, Miguel Clara wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 AM, NGie Cooper
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Miguel Clara
> >> wrote:
> >>>> I don&#
t 10:43 AM, Miguel Clara
>> wrote:
>>>> I don't think this is a 11-Current issue per say but probalby bad
>> config,
>>>> but since I'm using CURRENT I dicided to post to the list.
>>>>
>>>> When my system boots dn
11-Current issue per say but probalby bad
>config,
>> > but since I'm using CURRENT I dicided to post to the list.
>> >
>> > When my system boots dnscrypt fails to start with:
>> >
>> > Shared object "libsodium.so.13" not found, required
ENT I dicided to post to the list.
> >
> > When my system boots dnscrypt fails to start with:
> >
> > Shared object "libsodium.so.13" not found, required by "dnscrypt-proxy"
> >
> > But manual start works without issue, I've resinstalled li
> When my system boots dnscrypt fails to start with:
> >
> > Shared object "libsodium.so.13" not found, required by "dnscrypt-proxy"
> >
> > But manual start works without issue, I've resinstalled libsodium and
> > dnscrypt from ports and I no
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Miguel Clara wrote:
> I don't think this is a 11-Current issue per say but probalby bad config,
> but since I'm using CURRENT I dicided to post to the list.
>
> When my system boots dnscrypt fails to start with:
>
> Shared object
On February 23, 2015 10:04:19 PM WET, Miguel Clara
wrote:
>Probably does... I'll reboot to make sure, but that will surely do it
>:)
>
>I wasn't aware we could set ldconfig in the rc.d scripts... thanks for
>sharing.
>
>
>
Hum just tested and its still starting before ldconfig runs and so the
t; but since I'm using CURRENT I dicided to post to the list.
> >
> > When my system boots dnscrypt fails to start with:
> >
> > Shared object "libsodium.so.13" not found, required by "dnscrypt-proxy"
> >
> > But manual start works without
Running dmesg -a I see this relvant part:
> % dmesg -a | grep dns -A20
> Starting dnscrypt_proxy.
> Shared object "libsodium.so.13" not found, required by "dnscrypt-proxy"
> /etc/rc: WARNING: failed to start dnscrypt_proxy
> Starting local_unbound.
> Starting pflog
I don't think this is a 11-Current issue per say but probalby bad config,
but since I'm using CURRENT I dicided to post to the list.
When my system boots dnscrypt fails to start with:
Shared object "libsodium.so.13" not found, required by "dnscrypt-proxy"
But ma
30 matches
Mail list logo
