Have you checked your syslog to see if you are getting disk errors?
Also, I noticed that you have a VIA chipset and I know that
at least with the Bt848 driver they have caused havoc. I would
stick to Intel PCI chipsets.
Not sure if your motherboard supports or not do you have
the latest
]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Soft-updates feedback
Have you checked your syslog to see if you are getting disk errors?
Also, I noticed that you have a VIA chipset and I know that
at least with the Bt848 driver they have caused havoc. I would
stick to Intel PCI chipsets.
Not sure if your
On 20-Jul-99 Amancio Hasty wrote:
Have you checked your syslog to see if you are getting disk errors?
Also, I noticed that you have a VIA chipset and I know that
at least with the Bt848 driver they have caused havoc. I would
stick to Intel PCI chipsets.
Not sure if your motherboard
Glad that is working out for you. I am not into PCI low level bugs they are
very
difficult to indentify and in certain cases impossible to fix.
To give you a little hint:
1.6825 May 1999 Roger Hardiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Due to differences in PCI bus implementations
About a week ago, I've posted a message here and didn't got positive replies.
The problem is:
when I use soft-updates on IDE disks (disk on primary master, disk on
secondary master, CD on primary slave), any active disk-using program
(starting Netscape, starting EXMH) causes all other
while this is happening, what does 'iostat 1' and 'vmstat 1' tell you?
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
About a week ago, I've posted a message here and didn't got positive replies.
The problem is:
when I use soft-updates on IDE disks (disk on primary master, disk on
