Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-11-03 Thread Ian Freislich
David O'Brien wrote: On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 06:58:52PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at sector 63 and ending on cylinder boundary). This is completely

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 18:58:52, q (Ulrich Spoerlein) wrote about Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved: US First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the US available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at US sector 63 and ending on cylinder

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-11-01 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 16:43:12, q (Ulrich Spoerlein) wrote about Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved: It is NOT useless. Why do you think it is? Perhaps you don't relize that some BIOS's wont boot from a hard disk that isn't partitioned to agree with the specifications

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-30 Thread Terry Lambert
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Tue, 28.10.2003 at 23:29:03 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: It is NOT useless. Why do you think it is? Perhaps you don't relize that some BIOS's wont boot from a hard disk that isn't partitioned to agree with the specifications of the PeeCee. If you want to treat

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 06:58:52PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at sector 63 and ending on cylinder boundary). This is completely useless on servers and

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Nipper
On 28 Oct 2003, David O'Brien wrote: It is NOT useless. Why do you think it is? Perhaps you don't relize that some BIOS's wont boot from a hard disk that isn't partitioned to agree with the specifications of the PeeCee. If you want to treat your PC as a Sun, don't -- buy a Sun, FreeBSD runs

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:12:17 -0600, Mark Nipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: initial complaints, I do think that fdisk/disklabel in sysinstall need to be improved upon. They do not handle multi-terabyte disk arrays properly at all You should probably use GPT on multi-terabyte disk arrays.

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Nipper
On 29 Oct 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:12:17 -0600, Mark Nipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: initial complaints, I do think that fdisk/disklabel in sysinstall need to be improved upon. They do not handle multi-terabyte disk arrays properly at all You should probably

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-26 Thread Bill Moran
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Ok, this is perhaps pretty low priority to all of you (even to me), but since I installed 2 new 5.1 systems this week I cursed sysinstall several times! First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-26 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Monday 27 October 2003 04:28, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at sector 63 and ending on cylinder boundary). This is completely useless on servers and the help