On 2003-02-22 11:47, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm just too impatient, but it strikes me that I used to get more
> time before TCP gave up during a brief outage.
FWIW, I'm seeing delays in interactive sessions, and lots of timeouts
for `fetchmail -v' runs. I just started re
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 10:57:05AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> > Don't yet have any quantitative evidence that this is the case, but I feel
> > like TCP sessions have been timing out on me a lot faster than they used
> > to. For example, yesterd
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 10:57:05AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> > Don't yet have any quantitative evidence that this is the case, but I feel
> > like TCP sessions have been timing out on me a lot faster than they used
> > to. For example, yesterd
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 10:57:05AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Don't yet have any quantitative evidence that this is the case, but I feel
> like TCP sessions have been timing out on me a lot faster than they used
> to. For example, yesterday a machine got unplugged from the network for
> abo
Don't yet have any quantitative evidence that this is the case, but I feel
like TCP sessions have been timing out on me a lot faster than they used
to. For example, yesterday a machine got unplugged from the network for
about 15 seconds: in that time, the SSH sessions to the machine timed out
and
