Re: The PR db is not for -current problems, right?

2001-06-16 Thread Dima Dorfman
Jens Schweikhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello fellow PR drivers, > > just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs > against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users > know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the bleeding > edg

The PR db is not for -current problems, right?

2001-06-16 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users > know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the bleeding > edge and that they must be subscribed to current@ where they shall > discuss -current-related malfunctions. Right? Wrong. -current users

Re: The PR db is not for -current problems, right?

2001-06-16 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello, On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:51:38PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: > Hello fellow PR drivers, > > just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs > against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users > know what they are doing, especially that they're

The PR db is not for -current problems, right?

2001-06-16 Thread Jens Schweikhardt
Hello fellow PR drivers, just before I hit more people over the head that have submitted PRs against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the bleeding edge and that they must be subscribed to current@ where they