Michael Edenfield wrote:
* Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031127 17:50]:
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do
anything special, or just ignore the whole thing?
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 15:15, walt wrote:
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do
anything special, or just ignore the whole thing?
My understanding is that they perform a special linking/postprocessing
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do
anything special, or just ignore the whole thing?
Don't they fix the performance
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do
anything
* Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031127 17:50]:
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performance issues