On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:14:02PM -0500, Greg Hogan wrote:
> I am pretty new to buildworld and I am having the following problem:
>
> whenever I run 'make buildworld' I get errors when it gets to libfetch.
> Specifically, i get compile errors in the file
> /usr/src/lib/libfetch/common.c on lin
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Greg Hogan wrote:
> I am pretty new to buildworld and I am having the following problem:
>
> whenever I run 'make buildworld' I get errors when it gets to libfetch.
> Specifically, i get compile errors in the file
> /usr/src/lib/libfetch/common.c on lines 58-63. See the follo
I am pretty new to buildworld and I am having the following problem:
whenever I run 'make buildworld' I get errors when it gets to libfetch.
Specifically, i get compile errors in the file
/usr/src/lib/libfetch/common.c on lines 58-63. See the following links for
relevent information:
http://
This isn't really a -current issue, moving to hardware. Please strip the
Cc: in your reply.
Thus spake Gerrit K?hn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [18/06/03 11:20]:
> > FWIW, the best way I've seen to figure out which chip you're using (at least
> > between Ezra/Ezra-T and Nehemiah) is to look at the clockin
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:10:49AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote:
> > Well, all I can say is, that I bought it as "Ezra" and there is "Ezra"
> > printed on it. FreeBSD identifies it as Samuel2, though.
> And I bought my Ezra as a Nehemiah.
[...]
> So maybe they do have a way to distinguish the chip
Thus spake Gerrit K?hn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [18/06/03 11:00]:
> > If you have a 'Samuel2' core, then you have a Samuel2 core. It's neither
> > Ezra nor Ezra-T -- those two are the successors to Samuel2.
>
> Well, all I can say is, that I bought it as "Ezra" and there is "Ezra"
> printed on it. Fre
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:44:17AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote:
> I have an Ezra or an Ezra-T core (the only difference is Tualatin
> compatibility), and it produces an Unknown.
> If you have a 'Samuel2' core, then you have a Samuel2 core. It's neither
> Ezra nor Ezra-T -- those two are the succe
Thus spake Gerrit K?hn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/06/03 10:40]:
> > CPU: VIA/IDT Unknown (998.70-MHz 686-class CPU)
> > Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x689 Stepping = 9
> > Features=0x803035
>
> This one doesn't seem to support SSE, though I wonder why there is
> this "unknown". My C3 here is an
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:33:56PM -0700, David Yeske wrote:
> Anyone have a VIA C3? I'm running FreeBSD current
> on one and I don't see any gcc flags for the VIA C3.
> I think it has MMX and 3dnow, but it does not have SSE?
Up to the Ezra kernel the C3 doesn't suppoert
Anyone have a VIA C3? I'm running FreeBSD current
on one and I don't see any gcc flags for the VIA C3.
I think it has MMX and 3dnow, but it does not have SSE?
I was wondering what gcc flags other VIA C3 users
are using on FreeBSD. I am not sure what
optimizations are safe for this c
10 matches
Mail list logo
