On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Dimitry.
You wrote 7 сентября 2011 г., 21:17:20:
I think, that /usr/bin/cpp is valuable by itself, as it is handy
generic preprocessor tool, useful for preparing complex ipfw scripts,
for example. All others are bundled together, for sure.
I
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Dimitry.
You wrote 7 сентября 2011 г., 21:17:20:
I think, that /usr/bin/cpp is valuable by itself, as it is handy
generic preprocessor tool, useful for preparing complex ipfw scripts,
for example.
Hello, freebsd-current.
I'm building NanoBSD image based on latest HEAD sources. I've added
WITHOUT_GCC to install configuration, as I don't need gcc/g++ (it is
documented in man src.conf as disabling exactly gcc and g++), but it
affect /usr/bin/cpp too. And I need cpp for some config
On 2011-09-07 18:10, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
I'm building NanoBSD image based on latest HEAD sources. I've added
WITHOUT_GCC to install configuration, as I don't need gcc/g++ (it is
documented in man src.conf as disabling exactly gcc and g++), but it
affect /usr/bin/cpp too. And I need cpp for
Hello, Dimitry.
You wrote 7 сентября 2011 г., 21:17:20:
I'm building NanoBSD image based on latest HEAD sources. I've added
WITHOUT_GCC to install configuration, as I don't need gcc/g++ (it is
documented in man src.conf as disabling exactly gcc and g++), but it
affect /usr/bin/cpp too. And
On 2011-09-07 19:20, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
...
I think, that /usr/bin/cpp is valuable by itself, as it is handy
generic preprocessor tool, useful for preparing complex ipfw scripts,
for example. All others are bundled together, for sure.
I think, it is good idea to exclude cpp from this
