Re: Warning: ioctl(... TUNSLMODE ...) to be depricated....

2000-01-22 Thread Brian Somers
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unless there are objections in the next day or two, I'm going to deprecate the TUNSLMODE ioctl favour of TUNSIFHEAD. Where TUNSLMODE prepended a sockaddr to each packet, TUNSIFHEAD will instead prepend a 4-byte network-byte-order address family.

Warning: ioctl(... TUNSLMODE ...) to be depricated....

2000-01-21 Thread Brian Somers
Unless there are objections in the next day or two, I'm going to deprecate the TUNSLMODE ioctl favour of TUNSIFHEAD. Where TUNSLMODE prepended a sockaddr to each packet, TUNSIFHEAD will instead prepend a 4-byte network-byte-order address family. Jordan, I believe this change should go into

Re: Warning: ioctl(... TUNSLMODE ...) to be depricated....

2000-01-21 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Jordan, I believe this change should go into 4.0-RELEASE rather than happening afterwards so that we have a minimal number of people (hopefully none) using TUNSLMODE. TUNSLMODE was never MFC'd. Do it. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: Warning: ioctl(... TUNSLMODE ...) to be depricated....

2000-01-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unless there are objections in the next day or two, I'm going to deprecate the TUNSLMODE ioctl favour of TUNSIFHEAD. Where TUNSLMODE prepended a sockaddr to each packet, TUNSIFHEAD will instead prepend a 4-byte network-byte-order address family.