On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 05:32:41PM -0400, Mark S. Reichman wrote:
Second, I will respond as I see fit to any public posting
with or without your permission Mr. Mike Smith.
HUH?? Where did Mike direct something at you in this thread?
And yes, posting messages like that in a public forum is
The point is that the wording is not acceptable on the mailing list, no
matter whether you are offended or not.
That you're not is a good thing though :-)
Nick
On 13-Sep-99 Mark S. Reichman wrote:
I would say an apology is due... This is somewhat lame..
Nah, he's right I
First off its nice you know each other.
Second, I will respond as I see fit to any public posting
with or without your permission Mr. Mike Smith. And yes,
posting messages like that in a public forum is lame because
postings like that get arguments like this started.
Nick Hibma wrote:
The
What's wrong is that you're being stupid.
last pid: 548; load averages: 2.94, 2.55, 2.30up 0+01:05:36 00:14:35
64 processes: 4 running, 60 sleeping
CPU states: 50.4% user, 48.2% nice, 1.2% system, 0.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 81M Active, 18M Inact, 18M Wired, 5004K Cache,
On 12-Sep-99 Mike Smith wrote:
What's wrong is that you're being stupid.
Bah
Come on, you know better than that. The % totals are averages over the
last sampling period, while the CPU number just indicates the last CPU
that the process ran on.
Hmm..
It wasn't - I thought you
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:41:08 -0700, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What's wrong is that you're being stupid.
There is no call for such rudeness in the FreeBSD mailing-lists,
particularly from someone as centrally involved as you, Mike.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are
