Re: What happens with SECURELVL? (init complains)

2000-06-07 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Robert Watson wrote: > That said, I'm a little puzzled as to where securelevel is being defined > -- a bunch of stuff depends on the variable and yet my test build > succeeded without it in there. And you go that far also -- far enough to > boot rather than have the linking f

Re: What happens with SECURELVL? (init complains)

2000-06-07 Thread Robert Watson
At bde's request, I moved kern.suser_permitted to kern_prot.c and accidentally also trimmed kern.securelevel. I just committed it back into kern_mib.c. Please let me know if there are further problems. That said, I'm a little puzzled as to where securelevel is being defined -- a bunch of stuff

What happens with SECURELVL? (init complains)

2000-06-06 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
Now init always complains: init: cannot get kernel security level: No such file or directory It is because KERN_SECURELVL define still present in /sys/sysctl.h but gone from kern_mib.c Moreover, even define is gone from kern_mib.c, sysctl_kern_securelvl() function is still there! Please clean u