Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-15 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Bruce Evans wrote: > >> > ... > >> > I just got around to testing the patch in that reply: > >> > ... > >> > >> Your patch to nfs_vfsops won't apply to my Solaris kernel :-) > >> The protocol says "abytes" is unsigned, so the server shouldn't be ly

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-15 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > I just got around to testing the patch in that reply: > [ ... ] > > This seems to work. On a 2TB-epsilon ffs1 file system (*) on an md malloc > > disk (**): > > Try it again. This time, take the remote FS below its free reserve >

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-15 Thread Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I disagree. > > > >The intent of the negative number from df is to subtract the amount > >used from the total amount available, in order to get the amount > >remaining. > > I just don't see how you can possibly infer from the NFS spec that > "abytes" is anything other t

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: > I just got around to testing the patch in that reply: [ ... ] > This seems to work. On a 2TB-epsilon ffs1 file system (*) on an md malloc > disk (**): Try it again. This time, take the remote FS below its free reserve as the root user, and see what the client machine reports

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-15 Thread peter . edwards
(CC's trimmed, I'm sure I'm boring people at this stage.) >Peter Edwards wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> ...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes >of >> free space! > >[ ... ] > >> The NFS protocols have unsigned fie

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-15 Thread Terry Lambert
Peter Edwards wrote: > >>>On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > ...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of > free space! [ ... ] > The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed > equivalents: NFS can't represent negat

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread peter . edwards
>On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: > >> Bruce Evans wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: > >> >> The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed >> >> equivalents: NFS can't represent negative available disk space ( Without >> >> the knowledge of the under

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: > >> The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed > >> equivalents: NFS can't represent negative available disk space ( Without > >> the knowledge of the underlying fil

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Edwards
Bruce Evans wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: ...my sparc machine r

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote: > Bernd Walter wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > >>On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> > >>> >

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-14 Thread Peter Edwards
Bernd Walter wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: ...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of free

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-13 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of > > >free space! > > > > > >e

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of > >free space! > > > >enigma# df -k > >Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity

Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-13 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of >free space! > >enigma# df -k >Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >rot13:/mnt2 56595176 54032286 18014398507517260 0%/ro

Who needs these silly statfs changes...

2003-11-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of free space! enigma# df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0a 205434 123332 6566865%/ devfs 11 0 100%/dev /dev/d