On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:39:30PM -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hello,
Currently, we're an OpenSolaris shop but with the way things are going
over at Oracle/Sun we're starting to evaluate our options for keeping
ZFS but moving off Solaris. One of my concerns is that FreeBSD is
Hi Pawel,
Thank you very much for the response! Please forgive some of my
questions, as I'm a bit unfamiliar with the FreeBSD port.
What is the nature of the port? Is it something where each new version
of ZFS is a from-scratch effort to some degree? Or is it a point where
new ZFS versions are a
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:24:53AM -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Pawel,
Thank you very much for the response! Please forgive some of my
questions, as I'm a bit unfamiliar with the FreeBSD port.
What is the nature of the port? Is it something where each new version
of ZFS is a
Hi Pawel,
I totally understand the time commitment. I know several of the
primary ZFS committers on OpenSolaris, and realize that it's easier
for them because they're paid by Sun to work on it. Thank you very
much for your effort on making it work inside of FreeBSD. It's giving
all of us that
Hello,
Currently, we're an OpenSolaris shop but with the way things are going
over at Oracle/Sun we're starting to evaluate our options for keeping
ZFS but moving off Solaris. One of my concerns is that FreeBSD is
implementing ZFSv14 (ZFS itself is up to v23 I believe). For quite a
long time, ZFS
