Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

> On 26. Jan 2021, at 00:23, John Kennedy wrote: > >> Thanks, I am new to the EFI world. Does the name now have to be >> BOOTx64.efi ? >> >> root@zoo2:/boot # ls -l /mnt/EFI/freebsd/ >> total 824 >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 843776 Nov 21 10:50 loader.efi >> root@zoo2:/boot # > if there

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

> Thanks, I am new to the EFI world.  Does the name now have to be > BOOTx64.efi ? > > root@zoo2:/boot # ls -l /mnt/EFI/freebsd/ > total 824 > -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  843776 Nov 21 10:50 loader.efi > root@zoo2:/boot # I don't know. This came out of an email thread I had a while ago:

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

> On 25. Jan 2021, at 23:08, Allan Jude wrote: > > On 2021-01-25 16:03, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: >> >> >>> On 25. Jan 2021, at 22:15, mike tancsa wrote: >>> >>> On 1/25/2021 2:37 PM, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: > On 25. Jan 2021, at 21:31, Michael

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

On 1/25/2021 4:51 PM, John Kennedy wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:17:18PM -0500, mike tancsa wrote: >> Is there a way to check from the bin if its the right version ? strings >> of the file doesnt seem to show anything useful.  I wonder if its the >> UEFI boot that got missed ?  Just >> >>

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:17:18PM -0500, mike tancsa wrote: > Is there a way to check from the bin if its the right version ? strings > of the file doesnt seem to show anything useful.  I wonder if its the > UEFI boot that got missed ?  Just > > gpart bootcode -p /boot/boot1.efifat -i 1ada8 >

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

On 1/25/2021 4:03 PM, Toomas Soome wrote: > > >> On 25. Jan 2021, at 22:15, mike tancsa > > wrote: >> >> On 1/25/2021 2:37 PM, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: >>> On 25. Jan 2021, at 21:31, Michael Butler via freebsd-current

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

On 2021-01-25 16:03, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: > > >> On 25. Jan 2021, at 22:15, mike tancsa wrote: >> >> On 1/25/2021 2:37 PM, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: >>> On 25. Jan 2021, at 21:31, Michael Butler via freebsd-current wrote: I have a few

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

> On 25. Jan 2021, at 22:15, mike tancsa wrote: > > On 1/25/2021 2:37 PM, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: >> >>> On 25. Jan 2021, at 21:31, Michael Butler via freebsd-current >>> wrote: >>> >>> I have a few machines on which I've been hesitant to run 'zpool upgrade' as >>> I'm not

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

On 1/25/2021 2:37 PM, Toomas Soome via freebsd-current wrote: > >> On 25. Jan 2021, at 21:31, Michael Butler via freebsd-current >> wrote: >> >> I have a few machines on which I've been hesitant to run 'zpool upgrade' as >> I'm not sure of the (boot?) implications. They report like this .. >>

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

I ran into an issue not being able to boot because of v2 bookmarks on the boot pool on RELENG_13 just last Friday.     ---Mike On 1/25/2021 2:31 PM, Michael Butler via freebsd-current wrote: > I have a few machines on which I've been hesitant to run 'zpool > upgrade' as I'm not sure of the

Re: ZFS feature compatibility?

> On 25. Jan 2021, at 21:31, Michael Butler via freebsd-current > wrote: > > I have a few machines on which I've been hesitant to run 'zpool upgrade' as > I'm not sure of the (boot?) implications. They report like this .. > > imb@toshi:/home/imb> uname -a > FreeBSD

ZFS feature compatibility?

I have a few machines on which I've been hesitant to run 'zpool upgrade' as I'm not sure of the (boot?) implications. They report like this .. imb@toshi:/home/imb> uname -a FreeBSD toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #25 main-eb61de5b78: Fri Jan 22 10:03:02