Re: binutils-2.22: ld and --copy-dt-needed-entries

2011-12-06 Thread Andrew W. Nosenko
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 23:41, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 06/12/2011 23:24 Martin Matuska said the following: >> On 6.12.2011 17:48, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> Just for your information. >>> It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has >>> --no-copy-dt-needed-entries >>> behavior, and so explicit

Re: binutils-2.22: ld and --copy-dt-needed-entries

2011-12-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/12/2011 23:24 Martin Matuska said the following: > On 6.12.2011 17:48, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Just for your information. >> It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has >> --no-copy-dt-needed-entries >> behavior, and so explicit --copy-dt-needed-entries is now needed where the >> previ

Re: binutils-2.22: ld and --copy-dt-needed-entries

2011-12-06 Thread Martin Matuska
On 6.12.2011 17:48, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Just for your information. > It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has --no-copy-dt-needed-entries > behavior, and so explicit --copy-dt-needed-entries is now needed where the > previous default behavior is relied upon. > > A short excerpt from the

binutils-2.22: ld and --copy-dt-needed-entries

2011-12-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
Just for your information. It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has --no-copy-dt-needed-entries behavior, and so explicit --copy-dt-needed-entries is now needed where the previous default behavior is relied upon. A short excerpt from the man page for your convenience: > This option als