Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-17 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/8/16 eculp : > Quoting Mark Felder : > >> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:29:47 -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. >> wrote: >> >>> Worked perfectly.  Maybe it would be a good idea to put the step by >>> step solution for other folks like me who  haven't put enough effort >>> to understand the 20110815: entry. >

Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:52:37 -0500 eculp wrote: > Quoting Mark Felder : > > > > These steps are detailed in the handbook and you should be > > following them every time you rebuild CURRENT. > > Sorry, it looks like I have been doing things in the wrong order for > years. Thanks a lot for poin

Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread eculp
Quoting Mark Felder : On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:29:47 -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: Worked perfectly. Maybe it would be a good idea to put the step by step solution for other folks like me who haven't put enough effort to understand the 20110815: entry. These steps are detailed in the ha

Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:29:47 -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: Worked perfectly. Maybe it would be a good idea to put the step by step solution for other folks like me who haven't put enough effort to understand the 20110815: entry. These steps are detailed in the handbook and you should be

Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-08-16 15:47, eculp wrote: >> Is anyone else seeing this?  This is current AMD64.  I'm running the >> compile from Saturday 20110814 that I have been hammering and it has >> been rock solid. >> >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD home.encontact

Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 2011-08-16 15:47, eculp wrote: > Is anyone else seeing this? This is current AMD64. I'm running the > compile from Saturday 20110814 that I have been hammering and it has > been rock solid. > > # uname -a > FreeBSD home.encontacto.net 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #16: Sat Aug 13 > 05:09:17 CDT

Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote: >>Is anyone else seeing this?  This is current AMD64.  I'm running the >>compile from Saturday 20110814 that I have been hammering and it has >>been rock solid. > >># uname -a >>FreeBSD home.encontacto.net 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #16: Sat

RE: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread Johan Hendriks
>Is anyone else seeing this? This is current AMD64. I'm running the >compile from Saturday 20110814 that I have been hammering and it has >been rock solid. ># uname -a >FreeBSD home.encontacto.net 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #16: Sat Aug >13 05:09:17 CDT 2011 >r...@home.encontacto.net:/usr/obj/u

Re: buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread Florian Smeets
On 16.08.2011 15:47, eculp wrote: Is anyone else seeing this? This is current AMD64. I'm running the Yes, there have been X mails about it on this mailing list and an entry in UPDATING ;) compile from Saturday 20110814 that I have been hammering and it has been rock solid. /usr/obj/usr/

buildworld has been broken for me since Sunday 20110815 at atrun

2011-08-16 Thread eculp
Is anyone else seeing this? This is current AMD64. I'm running the compile from Saturday 20110814 that I have been hammering and it has been rock solid. # uname -a FreeBSD home.encontacto.net 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #16: Sat Aug 13 05:09:17 CDT 2011 r...@home.encontacto.net:/usr