the
local changes live in r.conf. I wish that more files had this
capability.
For example syslogd.conf or newsyslog.conf are updated between releases
but they are also prime candidates for local additions.
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries could be.
In addition you could make it
look in /usr/local/etc/syslogd.conf for loging requirments for
packages.
Hmmm... glancing through syslogd.c
files had this
capability.
For example syslogd.conf or newsyslog.conf are updated between releases
but they are also prime candidates for local additions.
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:39:33 -0800 (PST), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries could be. In addition you could make it
look in /usr/local/etc
syslogd.conf or newsyslog.conf are updated between releases
but they are also prime candidates for local additions.
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries could be. In addition you could make
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:39:33 -0800 (PST), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries could
files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries could be. In addition you could make it
look in /usr/local/etc/syslogd.conf for loging requirments for
packages.
To do this for every config file would be a lot of work. I do wonder
however
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:39:33 -0800 (PST), Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes' so that you could have a syslogd.local.conf
wher eall your local entries could
but they are also prime candidates for local additions.
Note that I'm in the middle of some newsyslog changes, so I'm
willing to think about it from that side of things. And Wes has
some syslogd changes coming, so maybe he'll be interested.
What would be really cool is if more config files could
do 'includes
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
of course..
New functionality vs POLA. An age old conflict.
Isn't POLA the reason why people gave up trying to extend the old standards
(like syslogd and inetd) and decided to build new feature-rich daemons like
10 matches
Mail list logo