Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:Hi,
:
:Sorry to unwantedly butt in, but the patch supplied by Seigo actually
:solved the vm_map.c locking problems which used to come up on my system.
:Just some info. :)
:
:Regards,
:
: -- Hiten Pandya
: -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It
Hi,
Sorry to unwantedly butt in, but the patch supplied by Seigo actually
solved the vm_map.c locking problems which used to come up on my system.
Just some info. :)
Regards,
-- Hiten Pandya
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea what the frig
:
:Hi,
:
:Sorry to unwantedly butt in, but the patch supplied by Seigo actually
:solved the vm_map.c locking problems which used to come up on my system.
:Just some info. :)
:
:Regards,
:
: -- Hiten Pandya
: -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It fixed some things, it broke some things. Pretty much
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
It fixed some things, it broke some things. Pretty much standard
fare for anyone who has ever done work on the vm_map lock, including
yours truely. John Dyson couldn't get it right, David Greenman couldn't
get it right, I couldn't
:Hmm. Ok, so right now the code that has been branched for DP1 makes use
:of Brian's recent locking commits. My original thought was we'd simply
:back it out of that branch to make sure that the DP is reliable. How hard
:would it be for us to switch to what you propose (just convert all slocks
[Add jhb and move to -current]
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:53:20 -0800,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Alfred * Brian F. Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020315 03:22] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the problem?
Damn good question. Are the tracebacks
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 19:08:53 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Seigo Attached patch implements sx_upgrade() which should work as you said
Seigo above. This compiles fine, but is not tested yet.
The last patch breaks INVARIANTS. This one compiles and seems to work.