[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writes:
> >Hi,
> >
> >It seems that disklabel is currently broken on -current. In `read' mode it
> >reports incorrect information about disk layout:
>
> Don't use the "-r" option and you will be ok.
Thank you Poul for you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> > Then how are we supposed to initialize devices which don't already
> > have a label?
> That is the only valid use of "-r", and it should be implicit in that case.
Thanks for the clarfication; I thought you
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writes:
>> > It seems that disklabel is currently broken on -current. In `read' mode it
>> > reports incorrect information about disk layout:
>> Don't use the "-r"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writes:
> > It seems that disklabel is currently broken on -current. In `read' mode it
> > reports incorrect information about disk layout:
> Don't use the "-r" option and you will be ok.
Then how are we supposed to initiali
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writes:
>Hi,
>
>It seems that disklabel is currently broken on -current. In `read' mode it
>reports incorrect information about disk layout:
Don't use the "-r" option and you will be ok.
Poul-Henning
>root@notebook# disklabel -r ad0s1
--
Poul-Henni
Hi,
It seems that disklabel is currently broken on -current. In `read' mode it
reports incorrect information about disk layout:
root@notebook# disklabel -r ad0s1
# /dev/ad0s1c:
type: unknown
disk: amnesiac
label:
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 240
sectors/cylinder: 15
