Re: drm, irqs, etc.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:42:39PM -0800 I heard the voice of Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus: > > In reality, 5.0 and 5.1 are neither, but questions have to go somewhere > and it was announced some time ago that until a V5 version was > declared 'STABLE', that questions should go to CURRENT and not STABLE. Well, if you wanna be pedantic about it, no -RELEASE's are -STABLE either. It's just a question of which branch the releases are branched (and/or snapshot'd) from. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: drm, irqs, etc.
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:43:02 -0800 (PST) > From: Mike Hoskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [ updating for completeness ] > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 21:24, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > > i've got XFree86 4.3.0 installed, from the "X-4" meta port. that went > > > smoothly. using the mga driver with a matrox g450 (dual head). no dri on > > > head 2 as expected, but again no obvious problems. > > > what i've noticed (this is 5.1-p8) is that after X has been running for > > > awhile, trying to exit X causes a hang. > > 5.1 is -current, not -stable, so you should be mailing the -current > > list. I've reset the cc: appropriately. > > i'm always confused about that, since i cvsup RELENG_5_1 not "." -- and > don't usually view something that's been tagged as a RELEASE the same as > CURRENT. ;) but thanks for moving this to the correct list. In reality, 5.0 and 5.1 are neither, but questions have to go somewhere and it was announced some time ago that until a V5 version was declared 'STABLE', that questions should go to CURRENT and not STABLE. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: drm, irqs, etc.
[ updating for completeness ] On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 21:24, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > i've got XFree86 4.3.0 installed, from the "X-4" meta port. that went > > smoothly. using the mga driver with a matrox g450 (dual head). no dri on > > head 2 as expected, but again no obvious problems. > > what i've noticed (this is 5.1-p8) is that after X has been running for > > awhile, trying to exit X causes a hang. > 5.1 is -current, not -stable, so you should be mailing the -current > list. I've reset the cc: appropriately. i'm always confused about that, since i cvsup RELENG_5_1 not "." -- and don't usually view something that's been tagged as a RELEASE the same as CURRENT. ;) but thanks for moving this to the correct list. > If you're not using up to date -current, please upgrade to -current past > October 24th, which included some DRM IRQ fixes. If the problem > persists, could you check that it doesn't happen with the DRI disabled > in your XF86Config? same configuration, now running: FreeBSD mojo.sfo.televoke.net 5.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Mon Nov 10 16:33:20 PST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MOJO i386 has not exhibited the behavior... if it reoccurs i will update the list, but it appears to happy for now. thanks, -mrh -- From: "Spam Catcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do NOT send email to the address listed above or you will be added to a blacklist! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: drm, irqs, etc.
On 06-Nov-2003 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 21:24, Mike Hoskins wrote: >> first, i apologize... i didn't think i'd get real answers on -questions >> so i'm posting this here. i realize 5.x isn't really "stable" yet, but i >> hope it's close enough to be relevant. ;) >> >> i've got XFree86 4.3.0 installed, from the "X-4" meta port. that went >> smoothly. using the mga driver with a matrox g450 (dual head). no dri on >> head 2 as expected, but again no obvious problems. >> >> what i've noticed (this is 5.1-p8) is that after X has been running for >> awhile, trying to exit X causes a hang. at first i thought it was some >> program under X not exiting properly (that's what it looks like), but i've >> reproduced the same behavior with nothing but X running. if i start X and >> then exit immediately, everything is fine. this seems to only happen >> after X runs for a week or more. >> >> the one thing i noticed, was some "interesting" behavior wrt drm and it's >> claimed IRQ. before starting X (after a reboot), `ps ax|grep irq` shows: >> >>19 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq9: pcm0 acpi0) >>20 ?? WL 0:00.10 (irq14: ata0) >>21 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq15: ata1) >>22 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq10: fxp0) >>23 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq6: fdc0) >>24 ?? WL 0:00.01 (irq1: atkbd0) >> >> the same from within X shows, >> >>19 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq9: pcm0 acpi0) >>20 ?? WL 0:01.05 (irq14: ata0) >>21 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq15: ata1) >>22 ?? WL 0:00.02 (irq10: fxp0) >>23 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq6: fdc0) >>24 ?? WL 0:00.08 (irq1: atkbd0) >>25 ?? WL 0:00.09 (irq12: psm0) >> 690 ?? WL 0:00.12 (irq11: drm0) >> >> and once exiting X (immediately, when it exits without hanging), >> >>19 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq9: pcm0 acpi0) >>20 ?? WL 0:01.04 (irq14: ata0) >>21 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq15: ata1) >>22 ?? WL 0:00.02 (irq10: fxp0) >>23 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq6: fdc0) >>24 ?? WL 0:00.07 (irq1: atkbd0) >>25 ?? WL 0:00.06 (irq12: psm0) >> 690 ?? WL 0:00.08 (irq11:) >> >> is irq11 not being freed? or is that normal behavior? i've double >> checked by X config, but i may have something wrong. i've read various >> web pages and XFree's suggestions about configuring the g450... but, >> again, i may have overlooked something. This is correct. Current currently doesn't try to destroy ithreads when they lose all their handlers. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: drm, irqs, etc.
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 21:24, Mike Hoskins wrote: > first, i apologize... i didn't think i'd get real answers on -questions > so i'm posting this here. i realize 5.x isn't really "stable" yet, but i > hope it's close enough to be relevant. ;) > > i've got XFree86 4.3.0 installed, from the "X-4" meta port. that went > smoothly. using the mga driver with a matrox g450 (dual head). no dri on > head 2 as expected, but again no obvious problems. > > what i've noticed (this is 5.1-p8) is that after X has been running for > awhile, trying to exit X causes a hang. at first i thought it was some > program under X not exiting properly (that's what it looks like), but i've > reproduced the same behavior with nothing but X running. if i start X and > then exit immediately, everything is fine. this seems to only happen > after X runs for a week or more. > > the one thing i noticed, was some "interesting" behavior wrt drm and it's > claimed IRQ. before starting X (after a reboot), `ps ax|grep irq` shows: > >19 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq9: pcm0 acpi0) >20 ?? WL 0:00.10 (irq14: ata0) >21 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq15: ata1) >22 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq10: fxp0) >23 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq6: fdc0) >24 ?? WL 0:00.01 (irq1: atkbd0) > > the same from within X shows, > >19 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq9: pcm0 acpi0) >20 ?? WL 0:01.05 (irq14: ata0) >21 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq15: ata1) >22 ?? WL 0:00.02 (irq10: fxp0) >23 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq6: fdc0) >24 ?? WL 0:00.08 (irq1: atkbd0) >25 ?? WL 0:00.09 (irq12: psm0) > 690 ?? WL 0:00.12 (irq11: drm0) > > and once exiting X (immediately, when it exits without hanging), > >19 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq9: pcm0 acpi0) >20 ?? WL 0:01.04 (irq14: ata0) >21 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq15: ata1) >22 ?? WL 0:00.02 (irq10: fxp0) >23 ?? WL 0:00.00 (irq6: fdc0) >24 ?? WL 0:00.07 (irq1: atkbd0) >25 ?? WL 0:00.06 (irq12: psm0) > 690 ?? WL 0:00.08 (irq11:) > > is irq11 not being freed? or is that normal behavior? i've double > checked by X config, but i may have something wrong. i've read various > web pages and XFree's suggestions about configuring the g450... but, > again, i may have overlooked something. > > this is a hard hang... ctrl-alt-bkspc, ctrl-alt-del, etc. have no effect. > i've since enabled "NoTrapSignals" in my X config hoping to get a core > dump the next time it happens. if i can manage that, i'll include it in a > future report. (or any other info you think is relevant.) > > please CC me directly with any replies, i am not currently subscribed to > -stable. 5.1 is -current, not -stable, so you should be mailing the -current list. I've reset the cc: appropriately. If you're not using up to date -current, please upgrade to -current past October 24th, which included some DRM IRQ fixes. If the problem persists, could you check that it doesn't happen with the DRI disabled in your XF86Config? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
